• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基因组复杂度是低效选择的结果吗?来自非重组区域内含子形成的证据。

Is Genome Complexity a Consequence of Inefficient Selection? Evidence from Intron Creation in Nonrecombining Regions.

机构信息

Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA

出版信息

Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Dec;33(12):3088-3094. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw172. Epub 2016 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1093/molbev/msw172
PMID:27655009
Abstract

Genomes show remarkable variation in architecture and complexity across organisms, with large differences in genome size and in numbers of genes, gene duplicates, introns and transposable elements. These differences have important implications for transcriptome and regulatory complexity and ultimately for organismal complexity. Numbers of spliceosomal introns show particularly striking differences, ranging across organisms from zero to hundreds of thousands of introns per genome. The causes of these differences remain poorly understood. According to one influential perspective, differences across species reflect the differential ability of selection in different populations to eliminate allegedly deleterious intron-containing alleles. Direct tests of this theory have been elusive. Here, I study evolution of intron-exon structures in genomic regions of recombination suppression (RRSs), which experience drastically reduced selective efficiency due to hitchhiking and background selection. I studied intron creation in eight independently evolved RRSs, spanning substantial diversity phylogenetically (plants, animals, fungi and brown algae) and biologically (sex chromosomes, mating type chromosomes, genomic regions flanking self-incompatibility loci, and the Drosophila "dot" chromosome). To identify newly created introns in RRSs, I compared intron positions in RRS genes with those in homologous genes. I found very few intron gains: no intron gains were observed in 7/8 studied data sets, and only three intron gains were observed overall (on the Drosophila dot chromosome). These results suggest that efficiency of selection may not be a major cause of differences in intron-exon structures across organisms. Instead, rates of spontaneous intron-creating and intron-deleting mutations may play the central role in shaping intron-exon structures.

摘要

基因组在结构和复杂性上在不同生物之间表现出显著的差异,在基因组大小以及基因、基因重复、内含子和转座元件的数量上存在着巨大的差异。这些差异对转录组和调控复杂性,最终对生物复杂性都有重要的影响。剪接体内含子的数量差异尤其显著,从每个基因组零个到几十万内含子不等。造成这些差异的原因仍知之甚少。根据一种有影响力的观点,物种间的差异反映了不同种群选择消除据称有害的内含子等位基因的能力差异。对这一理论的直接检验一直难以捉摸。在这里,我研究了重组抑制(RRS)基因组区域中外显子-内含子结构的进化,由于 hitchhiking 和背景选择,这些区域的选择效率急剧降低。我研究了八个独立进化的 RRS 中的内含子产生,这些 RRS 在系统发育上(植物、动物、真菌和褐藻)和生物学上(性染色体、交配型染色体、自我不相容基因座周围的基因组区域以及果蝇“点”染色体)具有很大的多样性。为了在 RRS 中识别新创建的内含子,我将 RRS 基因中的内含子位置与同源基因中的内含子位置进行了比较。我发现很少有内含子获得:在 7/8 个研究数据集中没有观察到内含子获得,并且总共只观察到三个内含子获得(在果蝇点染色体上)。这些结果表明,选择效率可能不是造成生物之间内含子-外显子结构差异的主要原因。相反,自发的内含子产生和内含子删除突变的速率可能在塑造内含子-外显子结构方面起着核心作用。

相似文献

1
Is Genome Complexity a Consequence of Inefficient Selection? Evidence from Intron Creation in Nonrecombining Regions.基因组复杂度是低效选择的结果吗?来自非重组区域内含子形成的证据。
Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Dec;33(12):3088-3094. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw172. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
2
Origin and evolution of spliceosomal introns.剪接体内含子的起源和演化。
Biol Direct. 2012 Apr 16;7:11. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-7-11.
3
How Common Is Parallel Intron Gain? Rapid Evolution Versus Independent Creation in Recently Created Introns in Daphnia.在溞类中,最近产生的内含子中普遍存在平行内含子增益吗?快速进化与独立产生的比较。
Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Aug;33(8):1902-6. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw091. Epub 2016 May 10.
4
Systematic analysis of intron size and abundance parameters in diverse lineages.系统分析不同谱系中内含子大小和丰度参数。
Sci China Life Sci. 2013 Oct;56(10):968-74. doi: 10.1007/s11427-013-4540-y.
5
Intron-rich dinoflagellate genomes driven by Introner transposable elements of unprecedented diversity.富含内含子的甲藻基因组由具有空前多样性的内含子转座元件驱动。
Curr Biol. 2023 Jan 9;33(1):189-196.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.11.046. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
6
Why Selection Might Be Stronger When Populations Are Small: Intron Size and Density Predict within and between-Species Usage of Exonic Splice Associated cis-Motifs.为何种群规模较小时选择作用可能更强:内含子大小和密度可预测外显子剪接相关顺式基序在种内和种间的使用情况。
Mol Biol Evol. 2015 Jul;32(7):1847-61. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv069. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
7
Molecular evolution of a Y chromosome to autosome gene duplication in Drosophila.果蝇 Y 染色体到常染色体基因复制的分子进化。
Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Mar;28(3):1293-306. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq334. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
8
Analysis of evolution of exon-intron structure of eukaryotic genes.真核基因外显子-内含子结构的进化分析
Brief Bioinform. 2005 Jun;6(2):118-34. doi: 10.1093/bib/6.2.118.
9
Intron gains and losses in the evolution of Fusarium and Cryptococcus fungi.在镰刀菌属和隐球菌属真菌的进化过程中内含子的获得和丢失。
Genome Biol Evol. 2012;4(11):1148-61. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evs091.
10
The architecture of pre-mRNAs affects mechanisms of splice-site pairing.前体信使核糖核酸的结构影响剪接位点配对机制。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 8;102(45):16176-81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508489102. Epub 2005 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Intron losses and gains in the nematodes.线虫中的内含子丢失和获得。
Biol Direct. 2022 Jun 5;17(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13062-022-00328-8.
2
Simulation of Chordate Intron Evolution Using Randomly Generated and Mutated Base Sequences.使用随机生成和突变的碱基序列模拟脊索动物内含子进化。
Evol Bioinform Online. 2020 Jan 29;16:1176934320903108. doi: 10.1177/1176934320903108. eCollection 2020.
3
Multivariate analysis of genomic variables, effective population size, and mutation rate.基因组变量、有效种群大小和突变率的多变量分析。
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Jan 25;12(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4097-3.