Jain Abhinav, Gupta Priyanka, Anand Surinder Pal Singh, Dang Archana
Assistant Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research and Hakeem Abdul Hameed Centenary Hospital , New Delhi, India .
Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research and Hakeem Abdul Hameed Centenary Hospital , New Delhi, India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Aug;10(8):TC11-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21057.8275. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
Replacement of conventional LASER films with digital paper prints as supplement to radiology reports may serve as an economical and environment friendly method. However, it is essential that such a change does not compromise patient's intended diagnostic outcome.
The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and acceptability of digital paper prints for the radiographic images by the treating physicians and radiologists.
This observational analytical study was done at a tertiary care hospital of New Delhi, India. A total of 58 consecutively ordered wrist radiographs of paediatric patients (6 months to 12 years of age) for ruling out rickets were retrieved from the PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication System). These 58 radiographs, out of which 21 (36.2%) had radiological evidence of rickets over PACS were printed on two different media i.e., LASER films and glossy photographic paper. An objective scoring for the severity of rickets was done on both LASER films and paper prints by six observers independently. Overall comfort level with paper prints was rated on a 1-5 point Likert scale. Data was analysed using STATA 14.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX).
Intra-observer percentage agreement and value of Cohen's kappa for PACS vs. LASER films and PACS vs. paper prints was equal i.e., 98.3% and 0.97, respectively. Intra-observer agreement between LASER films and paper prints for all six observers was excellent, ranging from 0.92 to 1.00; percentage agreement ranging from 94.8% to 100%. Fracture of ulna/radius present in 4 sets of the X-rays was well demonstrated in both LASER films and paper prints. Comfort level with paper prints was rated as 5 out of 5 by all due to no requirement of any special illuminated view box and dark room.
This study concludes that the use of paper prints may serve as a reliable alternative to LASER films to communicate the report of wrist radiographs for the treating physicians without any compromise over diagnostic information in cases of rickets.
用数字纸质打印件取代传统激光胶片作为放射学报告的补充,可能是一种经济且环保的方法。然而,这种改变不能损害患者预期的诊断结果,这一点至关重要。
本研究的目的是评估治疗医师和放射科医生对用于放射影像的数字纸质打印件的可靠性和可接受性。
本观察性分析研究在印度新德里的一家三级护理医院进行。从图片存档与通信系统(PACS)中检索出58例连续订购的儿科患者(6个月至12岁)用于排除佝偻病的腕部X光片。这58张X光片中,有21张(36.2%)在PACS上有佝偻病的放射学证据,分别打印在两种不同介质上,即激光胶片和光面相纸上。六名观察者分别对激光胶片和纸质打印件上佝偻病的严重程度进行客观评分。纸质打印件的总体舒适度根据李克特1 - 5分制进行评分。使用STATA 14.0(Stata公司,德克萨斯州大学站)对数据进行分析。
观察者内百分比一致性以及PACS与激光胶片、PACS与纸质打印件之间的科恩kappa值相等,分别为98.3%和0.97。六位观察者对激光胶片和纸质打印件的观察者内一致性都非常好,范围从0.92到1.00;百分比一致性范围从94.8%到100%。4套X光片中存在的尺骨/桡骨骨折在激光胶片和纸质打印件上都显示得很清楚。由于不需要任何特殊的照明观片箱和暗室,所有观察者对纸质打印件的舒适度评分均为5分。
本研究得出结论,对于治疗医师而言,在佝偻病病例中,使用纸质打印件作为传达腕部X光片报告的方式,可作为激光胶片的可靠替代方案,且不会在诊断信息上有任何损失。