• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹壁重建术不放置引流管能安全实施吗?

Can Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Be Safely Performed Without Drains?

作者信息

Ramshaw Bruce, Dean Jonathan, Forman Brandie, Heidel Eric, Gamenthaler Andrew, Fabian Michael

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2016 Aug;82(8):707-12.

PMID:27657586
Abstract

The use of closed suction drains in the abdominal wall is a common practice in abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) operations. Drains can be a conduit for bacteria and can cause pain and discomfort for patients after surgery. A single hernia program has implemented the principles of clinical quality improvement in an attempt to improve outcomes for hernia patients. An attempt at a process improvement was implemented to eliminate the use of drains in AWR by adapting the technique. A total of 102 patients undergoing AWR were included between 8/11 and 9/15 (49 months). Compared with the group before the attempt at eliminating the use of abdominal wall drains (8/11-9/13), the group of patients after the implementation of the attempted process improvement (9/13-9/15) had less wound and pulmonary complications, a shorter hospital stay, less time in the postanesthesia care unit, and less opioid use in the postanesthesia care unit as well as for the entire hospital stay. In this group of AWR patients, an attempt at process improvement that eliminated the use of drains led to improved outcomes. Abdominal wall drains may be able to be safely eliminated with appropriate technique adaptation for AWR.

摘要

在腹壁重建(AWR)手术中,在腹壁使用封闭式吸引引流管是一种常见的做法。引流管可能成为细菌的传播途径,并可能在术后给患者带来疼痛和不适。一个单一的疝气治疗项目实施了临床质量改进原则,试图改善疝气患者的治疗效果。通过调整技术,实施了一项流程改进措施,以消除AWR中引流管的使用。在8月11日至9月15日(49个月)期间,共有102例接受AWR的患者被纳入研究。与尝试消除腹壁引流管使用之前的组(8月11日至9月13日)相比,实施尝试性流程改进后的患者组(9月13日至9月15日)伤口和肺部并发症更少,住院时间更短,在麻醉后护理单元的时间更短,在麻醉后护理单元以及整个住院期间使用的阿片类药物更少。在这组AWR患者中,一项消除引流管使用的流程改进尝试带来了更好的治疗效果。通过对AWR进行适当的技术调整,腹壁引流管或许能够被安全地消除。

相似文献

1
Can Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Be Safely Performed Without Drains?腹壁重建术不放置引流管能安全实施吗?
Am Surg. 2016 Aug;82(8):707-12.
2
The use of a novel synthetic resorbable scaffold (TIGR Matrix) in a clinical quality improvement (CQI) effort for abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR).新型合成可吸收支架(TIGR Matrix)在腹壁重建(AWR)的临床质量改进(CQI)中的应用。
Hernia. 2022 Apr;26(2):437-445. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02221-7. Epub 2020 May 25.
3
Long-Term Outcomes after Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix.脱细胞真皮基质用于腹壁重建后的长期疗效
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Mar;224(3):341-350. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.11.017. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
4
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: The Uncertainty of the Impact of Drain Duration upon Outcomes.腹壁重建:引流持续时间对预后影响的不确定性
Am Surg. 2016 Mar;82(3):207-11.
5
Among 1,706 cases of abdominal wall reconstruction, what factors influence the occurrence of major operative complications?在 1706 例腹壁重建病例中,哪些因素会影响主要手术并发症的发生?
Surgery. 2014 Feb;155(2):311-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.08.014.
6
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Comparison of Totally Extraperitoneal and Transabdominal Preperitoneal Approaches.腹壁重建:完全腹膜外与经腹腹膜前入路的比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Feb;222(2):159-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.11.012. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
7
Delayed primary closure (DPC) of the skin and subcutaneous tissues following complex, contaminated abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR): a propensity-matched study.复杂污染性腹壁重建(AWR)术后皮肤和皮下组织的延期一期缝合(DPC):一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):2169-2177. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08485-z. Epub 2021 May 20.
8
Positive outcomes with negative pressure therapy over primarily closed large abdominal wall reconstruction reduces surgical site infection rates.在主要为闭合性的大腹壁重建中,负压治疗的积极效果可降低手术部位感染率。
Hernia. 2015 Apr;19(2):273-8. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1312-y. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
9
Indications and outcomes following complex abdominal reconstruction with component separation combined with porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement.复杂腹壁重建联合成分离术及猪脱细胞真皮基质强化后的适应证及治疗结果
Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Oct;69(4):394-8. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31822f997b.
10
Real-World Clinical Quality Improvement for Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.
Surg Technol Int. 2017 Jan 13;30:155-164.

引用本文的文献

1
Drain versus no drain in elective open incisional hernia repair: a propensity score matching analysis using the ACHQC database.择期开放性切口疝修补术中引流与不引流的比较:使用ACHQC数据库的倾向评分匹配分析
Hernia. 2025 Aug 29;29(1):261. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03439-z.
2
Retromuscular, periprosthetic drainage after hernioplasty with sublay mesh reinforcement in ventral hernias results in less retromuscular fluid collections but longer hospital stay and analgetic use with unclear effect on clinical outcome - a randomized controlled trial.腹外疝修补术中使用网片加强物行腹膜前修补术后的肌后、假体周围引流可减少肌后积液,但住院时间和镇痛药使用延长,对临床结果的影响尚不清楚——一项随机对照试验。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Nov 5;409(1):334. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03522-6.
3
Drain versus no drain in elective open incisional hernia operations: a registry-based analysis with 39,523 patients.择期开放式切口疝手术中引流与不引流的比较:一项基于登记的 39523 例患者的分析。
Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):1077-1091. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02862-4. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
4
Should routine surgical wound drainage after ventral hernia repair be avoided? A systematic review and meta-analysis.是否应避免在腹外疝修补术后常规进行手术切口引流?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2023 Aug;27(4):781-793. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02804-0. Epub 2023 May 14.
5
Drain placement in retromuscular ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹横筋膜后入路修补术时引流管的放置:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2023 Jun;27(3):519-526. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02792-1. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
6
Do surgical drains reduce surgical site occurrence and infection after incisional hernia repair with sublay mesh? A non-randomised pilot study.开放式无张力疝修补术后应用皮下置网是否可减少手术部位并发症和感染?一项非随机的初步研究。
Hernia. 2023 Aug;27(4):873-881. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02768-1. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
7
Retromuscular drain versus no drain in robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair: a propensity score-matched analysis of the abdominal core health quality collaborative.机器人辅助后腹膜腹外疝修补术中使用与不使用后腹膜引流:腹部核心健康质量协作的倾向评分匹配分析。
Hernia. 2023 Apr;27(2):409-413. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02696-6. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
8
The European Hernia Society Prehabilitation Project: A Systematic Review of Intra-Operative Prevention Strategies for Surgical Site Occurrences in Ventral Hernia Surgery.欧洲疝学会术前康复项目:腹疝手术中手术部位事件的术中预防策略的系统评价
Front Surg. 2022 Jul 13;9:847279. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.847279. eCollection 2022.
9
Early drain removal does not increase the rate of surgical site infections following an open transversus abdominis release.早期引流管去除并不会增加腹横肌切开术后开放释放术后手术部位感染的发生率。
Hernia. 2021 Apr;25(2):411-418. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02362-9. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
10
The use of a novel synthetic resorbable scaffold (TIGR Matrix) in a clinical quality improvement (CQI) effort for abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR).新型合成可吸收支架(TIGR Matrix)在腹壁重建(AWR)的临床质量改进(CQI)中的应用。
Hernia. 2022 Apr;26(2):437-445. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02221-7. Epub 2020 May 25.