• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复杂污染性腹壁重建(AWR)术后皮肤和皮下组织的延期一期缝合(DPC):一项倾向评分匹配研究。

Delayed primary closure (DPC) of the skin and subcutaneous tissues following complex, contaminated abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR): a propensity-matched study.

机构信息

Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive Suite 300, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):2169-2177. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08485-z. Epub 2021 May 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-021-08485-z
PMID:34018046
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Wound complications following abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) in a contaminated setting are common and significantly increase the risk of hernia recurrence. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of short-term negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) followed by operative delayed primary closure (DPC) of the skin and subcutaneous tissue after AWR in a contaminated setting.

METHODS

A prospective institutional hernia database was queried for patients who underwent NPWT-assisted DPC after contaminated AWR between 2008 and 2020. Primary outcomes included wound complication rate and reopening of the incision. A non-DPC group was created using propensity-matching. Standard descriptive statistics were used, and a univariate analysis was performed between the DPC and non-DPC groups.

RESULTS

In total, 110 patients underwent DPC following AWR. The hernias were on average large (188 ± 133.6 cm), often recurrent (81.5%), and 60.5% required a components separation. All patients had CDC Class 3 (14.5%) or 4 (85.5%) wounds and biologic mesh placed. Using CeDAR, the wound complication rate was estimated to be 66.3%. Postoperatively, 26.4% patients developed a wound complication, but only 5.5% patients required reopening of the wound. The rate of recurrence was 5.5% with mean follow-up of 22.6 ± 27.1 months. After propensity-matching, there were 73 patients each in the DPC and non-DPC groups. DPC patients had fewer overall wound complications (23.0% vs 43.9%, p = 0.02). While 4.1% of the DPC group required reopening of the incision, 20.5% of patients in the non-DPC required reopening of the incision (p = 0.005) with an average time to healing of 150 days. Hernia recurrence remained low overall (2.7% vs 5.4%, p = 0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

DPC can be performed with a high rate of success in complex, contaminated AWR patients by reducing the rate of wound complications and avoiding prolonged healing times. In patients undergoing AWR in a contaminated setting, a NPWT-assisted DPC should be considered.

摘要

背景

在污染环境下进行腹壁重建(AWR)后,伤口并发症很常见,并且显著增加疝复发的风险。本研究的目的是探讨在污染环境下,AWR 后短期负压伤口治疗(NPWT)联合延期一期缝合(DPC)对皮肤和皮下组织的效果。

方法

通过查询 2008 年至 2020 年期间在污染环境下接受 NPWT 辅助 DPC 的患者的机构疝数据库,进行前瞻性研究。主要结局包括伤口并发症发生率和切口重新打开。通过倾向匹配创建非 DPC 组。使用标准描述性统计方法,对 DPC 组和非 DPC 组进行单变量分析。

结果

共有 110 例患者在 AWR 后行 DPC。疝平均较大(188±133.6cm),常为复发性(81.5%),60.5%需要进行组件分离。所有患者的 CDC 分级均为 3 级(14.5%)或 4 级(85.5%),并放置生物补片。使用 CeDAR,估计伤口并发症发生率为 66.3%。术后,26.4%的患者发生伤口并发症,但只有 5.5%的患者需要重新打开伤口。复发率为 5.5%,平均随访时间为 22.6±27.1 个月。经过倾向匹配后,DPC 组和非 DPC 组各有 73 例患者。DPC 组的总体伤口并发症发生率较低(23.0% vs 43.9%,p=0.02)。DPC 组有 4.1%的患者需要重新打开切口,而非 DPC 组有 20.5%的患者需要重新打开切口(p=0.005),平均愈合时间为 150 天。总体上疝复发率较低(2.7% vs 5.4%,p=0.17)。

结论

在复杂的污染性 AWR 患者中,DPC 可以通过降低伤口并发症发生率和避免延长愈合时间来获得较高的成功率。在污染环境下接受 AWR 的患者中,应考虑 NPWT 辅助 DPC。

相似文献

1
Delayed primary closure (DPC) of the skin and subcutaneous tissues following complex, contaminated abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR): a propensity-matched study.复杂污染性腹壁重建(AWR)术后皮肤和皮下组织的延期一期缝合(DPC):一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):2169-2177. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08485-z. Epub 2021 May 20.
2
Biologic mesh is non-inferior to synthetic mesh in CDC class 1 & 2 open abdominal wall reconstruction.在CDC 1级和2级开放性腹壁重建中,生物补片并不逊色于合成补片。
Am J Surg. 2022 Feb;223(2):375-379. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.05.019. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
3
A Comparison of Acellular Dermal Matrices in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.脱细胞真皮基质在腹壁重建中的比较
Ann Plast Surg. 2019 Apr;82(4):435-440. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001692.
4
Outcomes of biologic versus synthetic mesh in CDC class 3 and 4 open abdominal wall reconstruction.生物补片与合成补片用于美国疾病控制与预防中心3级和4级开放性腹壁重建的效果比较
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):3073-3083. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09486-2. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
5
Impact of panniculectomy in complex abdominal wall reconstruction: a propensity matched analysis in 624 patients.游离皮瓣在复杂腹壁重建中的影响:624 例患者的倾向匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Sep;35(9):5287-5294. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08011-7. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
6
Positive outcomes with negative pressure therapy over primarily closed large abdominal wall reconstruction reduces surgical site infection rates.在主要为闭合性的大腹壁重建中,负压治疗的积极效果可降低手术部位感染率。
Hernia. 2015 Apr;19(2):273-8. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1312-y. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
7
Endoscopic subcutaneous component separation as an adjunct to abdominal wall reconstruction.内镜下皮下组织分离术作为腹壁重建的辅助手段。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):872-876. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5045-0. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
8
Primary fascial closure with biologic mesh reinforcement results in lesser complication and recurrence rates than bridged biologic mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction: A propensity score analysis.与桥接生物补片修复腹壁重建相比,采用生物补片加强的一期筋膜闭合术并发症和复发率更低:一项倾向评分分析。
Surgery. 2017 Feb;161(2):499-508. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
9
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Concomitant Ostomy-Associated Hernia Repair: Outcomes and Propensity Score Analysis.腹壁重建联合造口相关疝修补术:结果与倾向评分分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Mar;224(3):351-361.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.11.013. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
10
Impact of perforator sparing on anterior component separation outcomes in open abdominal wall reconstruction.保皮穿支血管在前腹壁切开重建术的应用对前壁分离结果的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4624-4631. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07888-8. Epub 2020 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Usefulness of delayed primary closure in unplanned caesarean section to reduce surgical site infection in a resource-poor high population country: a randomised controlled trial.在资源匮乏、人口众多的国家,计划性剖宫产术中延迟一期缝合对降低手术部位感染的有效性:一项随机对照试验
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2025 Mar 12;26(1):1-6. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2024.2024-7-1.
2
Concurrent Panniculectomy With Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Propensity-scored Matched Study of Quality Improvement Outcomes.同期行腹壁重建的腹壁整形术:一项关于质量改善结果的倾向评分匹配研究
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Dec 24;12(12):e6381. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006381. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
One-Year Health Care Utilization and Recurrence After Incisional Hernia Repair in the United States: A Population-Based Study Using the Nationwide Readmission Database.美国切口疝修补术后一年的医疗保健利用情况及复发率:一项基于全国再入院数据库的人群研究
J Surg Res. 2020 Nov;255:267-276. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.03.070. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
2
Surgical site occurrences, not body mass index, increase the long-term risk of ventral hernia recurrence.手术部位并发症而非体重指数增加了腹疝复发的长期风险。
Surgery. 2020 Apr;167(4):765-771. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the reduction of surgical site infection in closed incision management versus standard of care dressings over closed vascular groin incisions.
The impact of a closing protocol on wound morbidity in abdominal wall reconstruction with mesh.
闭合方案对使用补片进行腹壁重建时伤口发病率的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Feb;39(2):1283-1289. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11420-7. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
4
Comparison of Medical Research Abstracts Written by Surgical Trainees and Senior Surgeons or Generated by Large Language Models.外科住院医师和资深外科医生撰写的医学研究摘要与大型语言模型生成的摘要的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2425373. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.25373.
5
Practical Review on Delayed Primary Closure: Basic Science and Clinical Applications.延迟一期缝合的实践综述:基础科学与临床应用
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Aug 4;11(8):e5172. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005172. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Preservation of deep epigastric perforators during anterior component separation technique (ACST) results in equivalent wound complications compared to transversus abdominis release (TAR).在腹直肌前鞘分离技术(ACST)中保留深部腹壁穿支血管可导致与腹横肌释放(TAR)相当的伤口并发症。
Hernia. 2023 Aug;27(4):819-827. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02811-1. Epub 2023 May 26.
7
State-of-the-art abdominal wall reconstruction and closure.腹壁重建与关闭的最新技术。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jan 24;408(1):60. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02811-w.
8
Traumatic abdominal wall hernia and Morel-Lavallee lesion in a pediatric patient.一名儿科患者的创伤性腹壁疝和莫雷尔-拉瓦利损伤
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022 Sep 9;36(1):123-125. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2119565. eCollection 2023.
9
Outcomes of biologic versus synthetic mesh in CDC class 3 and 4 open abdominal wall reconstruction.生物补片与合成补片用于美国疾病控制与预防中心3级和4级开放性腹壁重建的效果比较
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):3073-3083. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09486-2. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
一项关于闭合性腹股沟血管切口闭合切口管理与标准护理敷料相比减少手术部位感染的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Vascular. 2020 Jun;28(3):274-284. doi: 10.1177/1708538119890960. Epub 2020 Jan 19.
4
The use of component separation during abdominal wall reconstruction in contaminated fields: A case-control analysis.在污染区域进行腹壁重建时使用组件分离:一项病例对照分析。
Am J Surg. 2019 Dec;218(6):1096-1101. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.10.019. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
5
Preperitoneal Ventral Hernia Repair: A Decade Long Prospective Observational Study With Analysis of 1023 Patient Outcomes.腹膜前疝修补术:一项长达 10 年的前瞻性观察研究,分析了 1023 例患者的结局。
Ann Surg. 2020 Feb;271(2):364-374. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002966.
6
Comparison of Superficial Surgical Site Infection Between Delayed Primary Versus Primary Wound Closure in Complicated Appendicitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.复杂性阑尾炎中延期一期缝合与一期缝合切口浅层感染的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2018 Apr;267(4):631-637. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002464.
7
Closed incision prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in patients undergoing major complex abdominal wall repair.复杂腹壁大手术患者的闭合切口预防性负压伤口治疗
Hernia. 2017 Aug;21(4):583-589. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1620-0. Epub 2017 May 23.
8
Multicenter, Prospective, Longitudinal Study of the Recurrence, Surgical Site Infection, and Quality of Life After Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair Using Biosynthetic Absorbable Mesh: The COBRA Study.使用生物合成可吸收补片修复污染性腹疝后复发、手术部位感染及生活质量的多中心、前瞻性、纵向研究:COBRA研究
Ann Surg. 2017 Jan;265(1):205-211. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001601.
9
The cost of preventable comorbidities on wound complications in open ventral hernia repair.可预防的合并症对开放性腹疝修补术后伤口并发症的影响
J Surg Res. 2016 Nov;206(1):214-222. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
10
Novel wound management system reduction of surgical site morbidity after ventral hernia repairs: a critical analysis.新型伤口管理系统降低腹疝修补术后手术部位发病率的批判性分析
Am J Surg. 2015 Feb;209(2):324-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.06.022. Epub 2014 Aug 7.