Suppr超能文献

用于特发性膝外翻的半骨骺阻滞术:经皮穿骨骺螺钉与张力带钢板的比较

Hemiepiphysiodesis for Idiopathic Genu Valgum: Percutaneous Transphyseal Screw Versus Tension-band Plate.

作者信息

Park Hoon, Park Minjung, Kim Sung Min, Kim Hyun Woo, Lee Dong Hoon

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam-gu.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang, Korea.

出版信息

J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Jul;38(6):325-330. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000821.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of angular deformity correction by percutaneous hemiepiphysiodesis using transphyseal screw (PETS) or tension-band plating (TBP) in growing children with idiopathic genu valgum with emphasis on the rate of deformity correction.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed cases of hemiepiphysiodesis for angular deformity in lower extremities between 2009 and 2014. A total of 90 limbs in 33 patients received PETS and 60 limbs in 24 patients received TBP. Angular measurements were compared preoperatively and at the time of hardware removal. The amount and rate of angular deformity correction were compared between the 2 groups. Potential factors affecting correction velocity were investigated using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Angular correction was achieved in all patients. The mean rate of correction was more rapid with PETS than with TBP at both the distal femur (0.92 vs. 0.64 deg./mo, respectively; P<0.001) and proximal tibia (0.72 vs. 0.55 deg./mo, respectively; P=0.019). Multivariate analysis showed that the used implant significantly affected the rate of correction: PETS demonstrated faster correction velocity than TBP (-0.26, 95% confidence interval, -0.35 to -0.17, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both PETS and TBP techniques result in satisfactory correction of coronal angular deformity in patients with idiopathic genu valgum. However, the observed rate of correction was faster with PETS than TBP. Correction with PETS, rather than TBP, may better serve patients near skeletal maturity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective comparative series.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较经皮半骨骺阻滞术采用经骨骺螺钉(PETS)或张力带钢板固定(TBP)治疗生长发育期特发性膝外翻患儿的畸形矫正效果,重点关注畸形矫正率。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2009年至2014年期间行下肢角状畸形半骨骺阻滞术的病例。33例患者共90条肢体接受了PETS治疗,24例患者共60条肢体接受了TBP治疗。术前及取出内固定时进行角度测量。比较两组间角状畸形矫正的量和率。采用多因素分析研究影响矫正速度的潜在因素。

结果

所有患者均实现了角状畸形矫正。在股骨远端(分别为0.92°/月和0.64°/月;P<0.001)和胫骨近端(分别为0.72°/月和0.55°/月;P=0.019),PETS的平均矫正速度均比TBP更快。多因素分析显示,所使用的植入物显著影响矫正率:PETS的矫正速度比TBP更快(-0.26,95%置信区间,-0.35至-0.17,P<0.001)。

结论

PETS和TBP技术均可使特发性膝外翻患者冠状角状畸形得到满意矫正。然而,PETS的矫正速度比TBP更快。对于接近骨骼成熟的患者,PETS矫正可能比TBP更合适。

证据级别

III级——回顾性比较系列研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验