Marcuzzi Anna, Dean Catherine M, Wrigley Paul J, Chakiath Rosemary J, Hush Julia M
Discipline of Physiotherapy, Department of Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences; The Centre for Physical Health, Macquarie University, Sydney.
Pain Management Research Institute, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards; Sydney Medical School - Northern, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J Pain Res. 2016 Sep 6;9:599-607. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S115659. eCollection 2016.
Quantitative sensory testing (QST) measures have recently been shown to predict outcomes in various musculoskeletal and pain conditions. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the emerging body of evidence investigating the prognostic value of QST measures in people with low back pain (LBP). The protocol for this review was prospectively registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. An electronic search of six databases was conducted from inception to October 2015. Experts in the field were contacted to retrieve additional unpublished data. Studies were included if they were prospective longitudinal in design, assessed at least one QST measure in people with LBP, assessed LBP status at follow-up, and reported the association of QST data with LBP status at follow-up. Statistical pooling of results was not possible due to heterogeneity between studies. Of 6,408 references screened after duplicates removed, three studies were finally included. None of them reported a significant association between the QST measures assessed and the LBP outcome. Three areas at high risk of bias were identified which potentially compromise the validity of these results. Due to the paucity of available studies and the methodological shortcomings identified, it remains unknown whether QST measures are predictive of outcome in LBP.
最近有研究表明,定量感觉测试(QST)指标可预测各种肌肉骨骼疾病和疼痛状况的预后。本系统评价的目的是总结有关QST指标在腰痛(LBP)患者中预后价值的新证据。本评价方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库中进行了前瞻性注册。从建库至2015年10月对6个数据库进行了电子检索。联系了该领域的专家以获取其他未发表的数据。纳入的研究需满足设计为前瞻性纵向研究、评估了LBP患者至少一项QST指标、在随访时评估了LBP状况以及报告了QST数据与随访时LBP状况的关联。由于各研究之间存在异质性,无法对结果进行统计学合并。在去除重复文献后筛选的6408篇参考文献中,最终纳入了3项研究。这些研究均未报告所评估的QST指标与LBP结局之间存在显著关联。确定了3个高偏倚风险领域,这可能会损害这些结果的有效性。由于现有研究匮乏且存在方法学缺陷,QST指标是否能预测LBP的预后仍不清楚。