Kong Jiang-Ti, You Dokyong Sophia, Law Christine Sze Wan, Darnall Beth D, Gross James J, Manber Rachel, Mackey Sean
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Pain Rep. 2021 Dec 8;6(4):e975. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000975. eCollection 2021 Nov-Dec.
Temporal summation (TS) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) represent different aspects of central pain processing. Their relationship and differential performance within distinct body locations are not well understood.
To examine the association between TS and CPM in chronic low back pain and the influence of testing location on this relationship.
We analyzed data from 2 clinical trials on participants with chronic low back pain (n = 264; 47.3% female; mean age = 41 years, SD = 12; mean pain = 5.3/10, SD = 1.4). Measures used included questionnaires assessing pain and negative affect, phasic thermal TS at the hand (thenar) and the lower back (lumbar), followed by CPM that included a thermal testing stimulus (Heat-6, the temperature where pain rating is 6/10) and a cold-pressor conditioning stimulus. Nonparametric, proportional odds logistic regression was used to model thenar, and separately, lumbar TS, using CPM, Heat-6, negative affect, and demographics.
Our models revealed a small association (βs = 0.17, = 0.01) between reduced CPM and heightened TS at both testing sites, regardless of demographics or negative affect.
Results suggest a modest association between TS and CPM, irrespective of anatomical testing location, demographics, and negative affect. These findings will help improve the methodology and interpretation of TS and CPM measurement in clinical pain populations.
时间总和(TS)和条件性疼痛调制(CPM)代表了中枢性疼痛处理的不同方面。它们在不同身体部位的关系和差异表现尚未得到充分理解。
研究慢性下腰痛患者中TS与CPM之间的关联以及测试部位对这种关系的影响。
我们分析了两项针对慢性下腰痛参与者的临床试验数据(n = 264;女性占47.3%;平均年龄 = 41岁,标准差 = 12;平均疼痛程度 = 5.3/10,标准差 = 1.4)。所使用的测量方法包括评估疼痛和负面情绪的问卷、手部(鱼际)和下背部(腰部)的阶段性热时间总和,随后是CPM,其中包括热测试刺激(热刺激6,即疼痛评分为6/10时的温度)和冷加压条件刺激。使用非参数比例优势逻辑回归分别对鱼际和腰部的时间总和进行建模,将CPM、热刺激6、负面情绪和人口统计学因素作为变量。
我们的模型显示,在两个测试部位,CPM降低与TS升高之间存在微弱关联(β值 = 0.17,P = 0.01),不受人口统计学因素或负面情绪的影响。
结果表明,无论解剖测试部位、人口统计学因素和负面情绪如何,TS与CPM之间存在适度关联。这些发现将有助于改进临床疼痛人群中TS和CPM测量的方法及解释。