Suppr超能文献

分心驾驶:风险认知与分心驾驶行为之间差异的研究

Driving under the influence of distraction: Examining dissociations between risk perception and engagement in distracted driving.

机构信息

University of Central Florida, United States.

Valencia College, United States.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Dec;97:220-230. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Oct 19.

Abstract

Driving while distracted is a critical and unwavering problem in the United States leading to numerous injuries and fatalities each year. While increasing legislation and developing technological interventions strive to ensure we only focus on driving, individuals still drive distracted. We surveyed college-aged adults to examine the factors that influence both their risk perception of driving while distracted and how often they engage in distracting activities and situations while driving. We found a disassociation between individuals' perception of driving distraction risk and their engagement with the distraction. Exposure, perceived knowledge of risks, fairness beliefs, and ratings of perceived visual and cognitive demands was associated with risk perception. Conversely, risk-seeking traits, how voluntary the task was perceived, and previous exposure to a distraction influenced engagement. Overall, we recommend additional research focusing on factors that predict engagement in driver distraction rather than perceived risk alone.

摘要

分心驾驶是美国一个严重且不容忽视的问题,每年都会导致众多人员受伤和死亡。尽管不断增加立法和开发技术干预措施,以确保我们只专注于驾驶,但仍有驾驶员分心驾驶。我们调查了大学生群体,以研究影响他们对分心驾驶风险的感知以及他们在驾驶时经常参与分心活动和情况的因素。我们发现,个体对驾驶分心风险的感知与他们参与分心行为之间存在脱节。暴露程度、对风险的认知程度、公平信念以及对感知视觉和认知需求的评分与风险感知相关。相反,冒险特质、任务的自愿程度以及之前接触过分心事物会影响参与度。总的来说,我们建议进行更多研究,重点关注预测驾驶员分心参与度的因素,而不仅仅是感知风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验