Yun Heather C, Murray Clinton K, Nelson Kenneth J, Bosse Michael J
*Department of Infectious Disease Service, San Antonio Military Medical Center, JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, Houston, TX; †Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD; ‡Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Womack Army Medical Center, Fort Bragg, NC; and §Department of Orthopaedics, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC.
J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Oct;30 Suppl 3:S21-S26. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000667.
Trauma to the extremities is disproportionately represented in casualties of recent conflicts, accounting for >50% of injuries sustained during operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Infectious complications have been reported in >25% of those evacuated for trauma, and 50% of such patients were treated in the intensive care unit (ICU). Osteomyelitis has been reported in 9% (14% of intensive care unit patients), and deep-wound infection in 27% of type III open-tibia fractures. Infections complicating extremity trauma are frequently caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria and have been demonstrated to lead to failure of limb salvage, unplanned operative take-backs, late amputations, and decreased likelihood of returning to duty. Invasive fungal infections of extremities have also presented a unique challenge in combat-injured patients, particularly in those with blast injuries with massive transfusion requirements and high injury severity scores. Infection prevention should begin at the time of injury and, although context-specific depending on the level of care, includes appropriate irrigation, surgical debridement, wound care and coverage, fracture fixation, and antibiotic prophylaxis, in addition to basic infection prevention measures. Clinical practice guidelines to address infection prevention after combat trauma (including extremity infection) were developed in 2007 and revised in 2011, with endorsement from the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Disease Society of America. Nevertheless, significant challenges remain, including austere environments of care, multiple transitions of care, and lack of coordinated efforts in prevention. Treatment of established infections is optimally multidisciplinary, particularly when deep wounds, bone, and joints are involved. Surgical debridement of overtly infected or necrotic tissue is necessary, with particularly aggressive margins if invasive fungal infection is suspected. Infected nonunion frequently requires the use of prosthetic materials for fixation, potentiating biofilm formation, and complicating medical therapy. Antibiotic therapy should be targeted at results of deep wound and bone cultures. However, this is complicated by frequent contamination of wounds, requiring differentiation between potential pathogens in terms of their virulence and decreased culture recovery in patient who have frequently received previous antibiotics. Lessons learned in infection prevention and treatment of orthopaedic trauma from combat can serve to inform the care of patients injured in natural disasters and noncombat trauma.
在近期冲突的伤亡人员中,四肢创伤的比例过高,在伊拉克和阿富汗行动中受伤的人员中,四肢创伤占比超过50%。据报告,因创伤后撤离的人员中,超过25%出现感染并发症,其中50%的此类患者在重症监护病房(ICU)接受治疗。据报告,骨髓炎发生率为9%(重症监护病房患者中为14%),Ⅲ型开放性胫骨骨折患者深部伤口感染率为27%。四肢创伤并发感染常由多重耐药菌引起,并已证明会导致保肢失败、计划外再次手术、晚期截肢以及重返工作岗位的可能性降低。四肢侵袭性真菌感染在战伤患者中也带来了独特挑战,尤其是在那些有爆炸伤、需要大量输血且损伤严重程度评分高的患者中。感染预防应在受伤时就开始,尽管根据护理级别因具体情况而异,但除基本感染预防措施外,还包括适当冲洗、手术清创、伤口护理与覆盖、骨折固定以及抗生素预防。2007年制定并于2011年修订了针对战伤后感染预防(包括四肢感染)的临床实践指南,该指南得到了外科感染学会和美国传染病学会的认可。然而,重大挑战依然存在,包括护理环境简陋、多次护理转接以及预防工作缺乏协调。对于已确诊的感染,最佳治疗方式是多学科联合,特别是当深部伤口、骨骼和关节受累时。对于明显感染或坏死组织进行手术清创是必要的,如果怀疑有侵袭性真菌感染,清创边缘应格外积极。感染性骨不连常常需要使用假体材料进行固定,这会促进生物膜形成,使药物治疗变得复杂。抗生素治疗应针对深部伤口和骨培养结果。然而,伤口频繁污染使情况变得复杂,需要根据潜在病原体的毒力区分它们,并考虑到经常接受过先前抗生素治疗的患者培养物回收率降低的情况。从战伤中骨科创伤感染预防和治疗中吸取的经验教训可为自然灾害和非战伤患者的护理提供参考。