Yanci Javier, Castillo Daniel, Iturricastillo Aitor, Ayarra Rubén, Nakamura Fábio Y
1Physical Education and Sport Department, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain; 2Physical Education Department, State University of Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil; and 3Nucleus of High Performance in Sport Department, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Jul;31(7):1787-1794. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001644.
Yanci, J, Castillo, D, Iturricastillo, A, Ayarra, R, and Nakamura, FY. Effects of two different volume-equated weekly distributed short-term plyometric training programs on futsal players' physical performance. J Strength Cond Res 31(7): 1787-1794, 2017-The aim was to analyze the effect of 2 different plyometric training programs (i.e., 1 vs. 2 sessions per week, same total weekly volume) on physical performance in futsal players. Forty-four futsal players were divided into 3 training groups differing in weekly plyometric training load: the 2 days per week plyometric training group (PT2D, n = 15), the 1 day per week plyometric training group (PT1D, n = 12), and the control group (CG, n = 12) which did not perform plyometric training. The results of this study showed that in-season futsal training per se was capable of improving repeat sprint ability (RSA) (effect size [ES] = -0.59 to -1.53). However, while change of direction ability (CODA) was maintained during the training period (ES = 0.00), 15-m sprint (ES = 0.73), and vertical jump (VJ) performance (ES = -0.30 to -1.37) were significantly impaired. By contrast, PT2D and PT1D plyometric training were effective in improving futsal players' 15-m sprint (ES = -0.64 to -1.00), CODA (ES = -1.83 to -5.50), and horizontal jump (ES = 0.33-0.64) performance. Nonetheless, all groups (i.e., PT2D, PT1D, and CG) presented a reduction in VJ performance (ES = -0.04 to -1.37). Regarding RSA performance, PT1D showed a similar improvement compared with CG (ES = -0.65 to -1.53) after the training intervention, whereas PT2D did not show significant change (ES = -0.04 to -0.38). These results may have considerable practical relevance for the optimal design of plyometric training programs for futsal players, given that a 1-day-per-week plyometric training program is more efficient than a 2-day-per-week plyometric training program to improve the futsal players' physical performance.
扬西、J、卡斯蒂略、D、伊图里卡斯特略、A、阿亚拉、R和中村、FY。两种不同每周总训练量相等的短期增强式训练计划对五人制足球运动员体能的影响。《力量与体能研究杂志》31(7):1787 - 1794，2017年——目的是分析两种不同的增强式训练计划（即每周1次与每周2次训练课，每周总训练量相同）对五人制足球运动员体能的影响。44名五人制足球运动员被分为3个训练组，每周增强式训练负荷不同：每周2天增强式训练组（PT2D，n = 15）、每周1天增强式训练组（PT1D，n = 12）和不进行增强式训练的对照组（CG，n = 12）。本研究结果表明，赛季中的五人制足球训练本身能够提高重复冲刺能力（RSA）（效应量[ES]= - 0.59至 - 1.53）。然而，虽然在训练期间方向改变能力（CODA）保持不变（ES = 0.00），但15米冲刺（ES = 0.73）和垂直纵跳（VJ）成绩（ES = - 0.30至 - 1.37）显著下降。相比之下，PT2D和PT1D增强式训练有效地提高了五人制足球运动员的15米冲刺（ES = - 0.64至 - 1.00）、CODA（ES = - 1.83至 - 5.50）和立定跳远（ES = 0.33 - 0.64）成绩。尽管如此，所有组（即PT2D、PT1D和CG）的VJ成绩均有所下降（ES = - 0.04至 - 1.37）。关于RSA成绩，训练干预后，PT1D与CG相比显示出类似的提高（ES = - 0.65至 - 1.53），而PT2D没有显著变化（ES = - 0.04至 - 0.38）。鉴于每周1天的增强式训练计划比每周2天的增强式训练计划在提高五人制足球运动员体能方面更有效，这些结果可能对五人制足球运动员增强式训练计划的优化设计具有重要的实际意义。
