Suppr超能文献

增强式训练与综合训练对下肢爆发力的效果:一项系统评价。

Effectiveness of plyometric training vs. complex training on the explosive power of lower limbs: A Systematic review.

作者信息

Wang Xiaolin, Lv Changhai, Qin Xinmin, Ji Shuyu, Dong Delong

机构信息

Department of Sport Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.

Department of Physical Education, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai, Shandong, China.

出版信息

Front Physiol. 2023 Jan 18;13:1061110. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1061110. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Explosive power is considered an important factor in competitive events. Thus, strategies such as complex training (CT) and plyometric training (PLT) are effective at improving explosive power. However, it is still not clear which of the two strategies can enable greater improvements on the explosive power. Thus, the aim of this systematic review was to compare the effects of PLT and CT on the explosive power of the lower limbs. The Review Manager and GraphPad Prism programs were used to analyze the synthetic and time effects (effects over training time) on explosive power (i.e., jump ability, sprint ability) and maximum strength. Our research identified 87 studies comprising 1,355 subjects aged 10-26.4 years. The results suggested the following: 1) Synthetic effects on jump ability (Hedges' ): .79 ( < .001) for unloaded PLT, 1.35 ( < .001) for loaded PLT and .85 ( < .001) for CT; 2) Synthetic effects on sprint ability: .83 ( < .001) for unloaded PLT, -2.11 ( < .001) for loaded PLT and -.78 ( < .001) for CT; 3) Synthetic effects on maximum strength: .84 ( < .001) for loaded PLT and 1.53 ( < .001) for CT; 4) The time effects of unloaded PLT and CT on explosive power were similar, but the time effects of CT on maximum strength were obviously above that of PLT. In conclusion, unloaded PLT and CT have a similar effect on explosive performance in the short term but loaded PLT has a better effect. The improvement of the maximum strength caused by CT was greater than that induced by PLT. In addition, more than 10 weeks of training may be more beneficial for the improvement of power. Therefore, for explosive power training, we suggest adopting unloaded or light-loaded PLT during a short season and applying CT during an annual or long training cycle.

摘要

爆发力被认为是竞技项目中的一个重要因素。因此,诸如综合训练(CT)和增强式训练(PLT)等策略在提高爆发力方面是有效的。然而,目前仍不清楚这两种策略中哪一种能在爆发力提升方面带来更大的改善。因此,本系统评价的目的是比较PLT和CT对下肢爆发力的影响。使用Review Manager和GraphPad Prism程序分析对爆发力(即跳跃能力、短跑能力)和最大力量的综合及时间效应(训练时间上的效应)。我们的研究纳入了87项研究,共1355名年龄在10至26.4岁之间的受试者。结果表明:1)对跳跃能力的综合效应(Hedges' ):无负重PLT为0.79(P <.001),负重PLT为1.35(P <.001),CT为0.85(P <.001);2)对短跑能力的综合效应:无负重PLT为0.83(P <.001),负重PLT为 -2.11(P <.001),CT为 -0.78(P <.001);3)对最大力量的综合效应:负重PLT为0.84(P <.001),CT为1.53(P <.001);4)无负重PLT和CT对爆发力的时间效应相似,但CT对最大力量的时间效应明显高于PLT。总之,无负重PLT和CT在短期内对爆发力表现有相似的影响,但负重PLT效果更好。CT引起的最大力量提升大于PLT。此外,超过10周的训练可能对力量提升更有益。因此,对于爆发力训练,我们建议在短赛季采用无负重或轻负重PLT,并在年度或长期训练周期中应用CT。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12cc/9889940/1f52a4952fee/fphys-13-1061110-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验