Suppr超能文献

清醒和睡眠状态下的脑深部电刺激的并发症发生率、住院时间和再入院率。

Complication rates, lengths of stay, and readmission rates in "awake" and "asleep" deep brain simulation.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2017 Aug;127(2):360-369. doi: 10.3171/2016.6.JNS152946. Epub 2016 Sep 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE As the number of deep brain stimulation (DBS) procedures performed under general anesthesia ("asleep" DBS) increases, it is more important to assess the rates of adverse events, inpatient lengths of stay (LOS), and 30-day readmission rates in patients undergoing these procedures compared with those in patients undergoing traditional "awake" DBS without general anesthesia. METHODS All patients in an institutional database who had undergone awake or asleep DBS procedures performed by a single surgeon between August 2011 and August 2014 were reviewed. Adverse events, inpatient LOS, and 30-day readmissions were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 490 electrodes were placed in 284 patients, of whom 126 (44.4%) underwent awake surgery and 158 (55.6%) underwent asleep surgery. The most frequent overall complication for the cohort was postoperative mental status change (13 patients [4.6%]), followed by hemorrhage (4 patients [1.4%]), seizure (4 patients [1.4%]), and hardware-related infection (3 patients [1.1%]). Mean LOS for all 284 patients was 1.19 ± 1.29 days (awake: 1.06 ± 0.46 days; asleep: 1.30 ± 1.67 days; p = 0.08). Overall, the 30-day readmission rate was 1.4% (1 awake patient, 3 asleep patients). There were no significant differences in complications, LOS, and 30-day readmissions between awake and asleep groups. CONCLUSIONS Both awake and asleep DBS can be performed safely with low complication rates. The authors found no significant differences between the 2 procedure groups in adverse events, inpatient LOS, and 30-day readmission rates.

摘要

目的

随着全身麻醉下(“全麻”)进行的深部脑刺激(DBS)手术数量的增加,评估接受这些手术的患者与接受传统无全身麻醉“清醒”DBS 手术的患者相比,不良事件、住院时间(LOS)和 30 天再入院率变得更为重要。

方法

对 2011 年 8 月至 2014 年 8 月期间,由一位外科医生进行的全麻或清醒 DBS 手术的机构数据库中的所有患者进行了回顾。分析了不良事件、住院 LOS 和 30 天再入院率。

结果

共对 284 例患者的 490 个电极进行了放置,其中 126 例(44.4%)接受了清醒手术,158 例(55.6%)接受了全麻手术。该队列中最常见的总体并发症是术后精神状态改变(13 例[4.6%]),其次是出血(4 例[1.4%])、癫痫发作(4 例[1.4%])和硬件相关感染(3 例[1.1%])。所有 284 例患者的平均 LOS 为 1.19 ± 1.29 天(清醒:1.06 ± 0.46 天;全麻:1.30 ± 1.67 天;p = 0.08)。总体而言,30 天再入院率为 1.4%(1 例清醒患者,3 例全麻患者)。在并发症、LOS 和 30 天再入院率方面,清醒组和全麻组之间无显著差异。

结论

清醒和全麻 DBS 均可安全进行,并发症发生率低。作者发现,2 组手术在不良事件、住院 LOS 和 30 天再入院率方面无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验