Amin D B, Lawless I M, Sommerfeld D, Stanley R M, Ding B, Costi J J
Biomechanics and Implants Research Group, The Medical Device Research Institute, School of Computer Science, Engineering and Mathematics, Flinders University, Australia.
Institute of Biomechanics, Hamburg University of Technology, Germany.
J Biomech. 2016 Oct 3;49(14):3407-3414. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.09.009. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
The complex, direction-dependent, poro-viscoelastic properties of the intervertebral disc (disc) suggest that investigations of the six degree of freedom (6DOF) behaviour may be susceptible to inter-test variation in mechanical response if the disc does not return to initial conditions between loading directions. No studies have quantified the effects of sequential multi-directional loading on the consistency of the compressive response of the disc throughout a 6DOF testing protocol. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the effect of 6DOF loading on the compressive properties (stiffness and phase angle) of human discs, as evaluated by a reference compression test performed after each single DOF test. Fourteen intact human functional spinal units (FSU) were tested in each of ±6DOFs (shear directions followed by bending and compression) across four orders of magnitude loading frequencies (0.001-1Hz), followed by reference compression tests while subjected to physiological preload, hydration, and body temperature conditions in a hexapod robot. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant within-subjects effects between the reference compression tests for modulus (p<0.001), stiffness (p<0.001), and phase angle (p=0.008). Significant post-hoc pairwise comparisons were initially seen between the control and other reference compression tests for stiffness and modulus after the shear DOFs, however, no significant differences were present after the final reference compression test compared to control. More pronounced effects were seen for stiffness in comparison to modulus and phase angle. These effects may be due to three potentials factors, which include the sequence of testing, the cohort of degenerative specimens, and/or cumulative creep due to the constant application of a follower load. While the sequence of test directions was chosen to minimise the biphasic effect, there may be other sequences, which could result in minimal changes in compressive properties.
椎间盘复杂的、方向依赖性的孔隙粘弹性特性表明,如果椎间盘在不同加载方向之间不能恢复到初始状态,那么对其六自由度(6DOF)行为的研究可能容易受到机械响应测试间变化的影响。尚无研究量化在整个6DOF测试方案中,连续多方向加载对椎间盘压缩响应一致性的影响。因此,本研究的目的是通过在每次单自由度测试后进行的参考压缩试验,确定6DOF加载对人体椎间盘压缩特性(刚度和相角)的影响。在六足机器人中,对14个完整的人体功能脊柱单元(FSU)在±6个自由度(先剪切方向,后弯曲和压缩)下进行测试,加载频率跨越四个数量级(0.001 - 1Hz),随后在生理预负荷、水化和体温条件下进行参考压缩试验。重复测量方差分析显示,参考压缩试验之间在模量(p<0.001)、刚度(p<0.001)和相角(p = 0.008)方面存在显著的受试者内效应。在剪切自由度之后,最初在对照与其他参考压缩试验之间的刚度和模量的事后成对比较中观察到显著差异,然而,与对照相比,最终参考压缩试验后没有显著差异。与模量和相角相比,刚度的影响更明显。这些影响可能归因于三个潜在因素,包括测试顺序、退变标本队列和/或由于持续施加跟随负荷导致的累积蠕变。虽然选择测试方向的顺序是为了最小化双相效应,但可能存在其他顺序,这可能导致压缩特性的变化最小。