Amin Dhara B, Lawless Isaac M, Sommerfeld Dana, Stanley Richard M, Ding Boyin, Costi John J
J Biomech Eng. 2015 May;137(5):054501. doi: 10.1115/1.4029698. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and Wood's Metal are fixation media for biomechanical testing; however, the effect of each potting medium on the measured six degree-of-freedom (DOF) mechanical properties of human lumbar intervertebral discs is unknown. The first aim of this study was to compare the measured 6DOF elastic and viscoelastic properties of the disc when embedded in PMMA compared to repotting in Wood's Metal. The second aim was to compare the surface temperature of the disc when potted with PMMA and Wood's Metal. Six human lumbar functional spinal units (FSUs) were first potted in PMMA, and subjected to overnight preload in a saline bath at 37 °C followed by five haversine loading cycles at 0.1 Hz in each of 6DOF loading directions (compression, left/right lateral bending, flexion, extension, left/right axial rotation, anterior/posterior, and lateral shear). Each specimen was then repotted in Wood's Metal and subjected to a 2-h re-equilibrating preload followed by repeating the same 6DOF tests. Outcome measures of stiffness and phase angle were calculated from the final loading cycle in each DOF and were expressed as normalized percentages relative to PMMA (100%). Disc surface temperatures (anterior, left/right lateral) were measured during potting. Paired t-tests (with alpha adjusted for multiple DOF) were conducted to compare the differences in each outcome parameter between PMMA and Wood's Metal. No significant differences in stiffness or phase angle were found between PMMA and Wood's Metal. On average, the largest trending differences were found in the shear DOFs for both stiffness (approximately 35% greater for Wood's Metal compared to PMMA) and phase angle (approximately 15% greater for Wood's Metal). A significant difference in disc temperature was found at the anterior surface after potting with Wood's Metal compared to PMMA, which did not exceed 26 °C. Wood's Metal is linear elastic, stiffer than PMMA and may reduce measurement artifact of potting medium, particularly in the shear directions. Furthermore, it is easier to remove than PMMA, reuseable, and cost effective.
聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)和伍德合金是用于生物力学测试的固定介质;然而,每种灌封介质对测量的人腰椎间盘六自由度(DOF)力学性能的影响尚不清楚。本研究的首要目的是比较椎间盘嵌入PMMA时与重新灌封在伍德合金中的测量六自由度弹性和粘弹性特性。第二个目的是比较用PMMA和伍德合金灌封时椎间盘的表面温度。六个人类腰椎功能脊柱单元(FSU)首先用PMMA灌封,并在37°C的盐浴中进行过夜预加载,随后在六个自由度加载方向(压缩、左/右侧弯、前屈、后伸、左/右轴向旋转、前后和横向剪切)中的每个方向以0.1Hz进行五个半正弦加载循环。然后将每个标本重新灌封在伍德合金中,并进行2小时的重新平衡预加载,随后重复相同的六自由度测试。从每个自由度的最终加载循环中计算刚度和相角的结果测量值,并表示为相对于PMMA(100%)的归一化百分比。在灌封过程中测量椎间盘表面温度(前侧、左/右侧)。进行配对t检验(针对多个自由度调整α)以比较PMMA和伍德合金之间每个结果参数的差异。在PMMA和伍德合金之间未发现刚度或相角的显著差异。平均而言,在剪切自由度中发现了最大的趋势差异,在刚度方面(伍德合金比PMMA大约大35%)和相角方面(伍德合金比PMMA大约大15%)。与PMMA相比,用伍德合金灌封后在前表面发现椎间盘温度存在显著差异,不超过26°C。伍德合金是线性弹性的,比PMMA更硬,并且可能减少灌封介质的测量伪影,特别是在剪切方向上。此外,它比PMMA更容易去除、可重复使用且具有成本效益。