Hammer A
, 4 Clarendon Close, Bearsted, Maidstone, Kent, ME14 4JD, England, UK.
Ir J Med Sci. 2017 Nov;186(4):939-946. doi: 10.1007/s11845-016-1506-7. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
It was 140 years ago that George von Meyer presented his anatomical diagrams of human bones to a meeting in Zurich. There he was told by Prof. Karl Culmann that the trabecular lines shown within the diagram of the upper femur closely resembled those lines of force which Culmann had determined with Graphic Statics to be passing through a curved, loaded Fairbairn crane. This drew the attention of Julius Wolff, who used this as the basis for his 'Trajectorial theory' which was widely accepted and, to date, has been the underlying basis for all biomechanical investigations of this region. Following Wolff and Culmann, the upper femur is considered to be a curved structure and is investigated as such. Unfortunately, this concept is wrong. The upper femur is not curved but is angular. It is formed by the junction of two straight bones, the femoral neck and the femoral shaft, as may be simply seen as the neck/shaft angle constructed on the antero-posterior radiograph of any normal femur. The internal trabecular bone forms only part of the load bearing structure of the femoral neck. The configuration of this trabecular substance in this region suggests that it is related specifically to the force present during flexion and extension movements of the hip joint. This being so, combined with the delayed timing of the appearance of the trabecular columns, it must be questioned as to whether the remodelling of the upper femur is in response to one or to two distinct forces.
140年前,乔治·冯·迈耶(George von Meyer)在苏黎世的一次会议上展示了他绘制的人体骨骼解剖图。在那里,卡尔·库尔曼教授(Karl Culmann)告诉他,在股骨上段的解剖图中显示的骨小梁线与库尔曼用图解静力学确定的通过弯曲的、承载负荷的费尔贝恩起重机的力线非常相似。这引起了尤利乌斯·沃尔夫(Julius Wolff)的注意,他以此为基础提出了他的“轨迹理论”,该理论被广泛接受,并且迄今为止一直是该区域所有生物力学研究的基础。继沃尔夫和库尔曼之后,股骨上段被认为是一个弯曲结构,并以此进行研究。不幸的是,这个概念是错误的。股骨上段不是弯曲的,而是有角度的。它是由两根直骨,即股骨颈和股骨干的连接处形成的,这在任何正常股骨的前后位X线片上构建的颈干角中可以简单地看到。内部的骨小梁仅构成股骨颈承重结构的一部分。该区域这种骨小梁物质的形态表明,它与髋关节屈伸运动期间存在的力有特定关系。既然如此,再加上骨小梁柱出现时间的延迟,那么股骨上段的重塑是否是对一种或两种不同的力做出反应就值得质疑了。