Lin Qiyi, Fu Hong, Wan Yingjia, Zhou Nan, Xu Hui
School of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Department of Nursing, Jiangsu Vocational College of Nursing, Huaian, People's Republic of China.
Int J Psychol. 2018 Oct;53(5):388-396. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12392. Epub 2016 Sep 25.
We investigated relationships between Chinese children's imaginary companions (ICs) and peer relationships and social competence in 160 children, aged 5-6 years old. Children and their mothers participated in the interviews regarding the details of the children's ICs, including the type of the companion and the quality of the child-IC relationship. Peer relationships were assessed using sociometric nomination and perceived popularity nomination. Teachers rated children's social competence. Here, 55 children (34.3%) were deemed to have engaged in imaginary companion play. There was no relationship between imaginary companion types and child-IC relationship qualities. Children with invisible friends received more positive nominations than children with personified objects. Children with egalitarian relationships received more positive nominations and popularity nominations, but fewer negative nominations and unpopularity nominations than children with hierarchical relationships. Compared with children with hierarchical relationships, teachers rated the children with egalitarian relationships higher in social competence. The results suggest that imaginary companion types and relationship qualities may represent different dimensions of imaginary companions, calling attentions to the different mechanisms underlying imaginary companion types and relationship qualities with respect to social functioning.
我们对160名5至6岁中国儿童的假想同伴(ICs)与同伴关系及社交能力之间的关系进行了调查。儿童及其母亲参与了关于儿童假想同伴细节的访谈,包括同伴的类型以及儿童与假想同伴关系的质量。同伴关系通过社会测量提名和感知受欢迎程度提名进行评估。教师对儿童的社交能力进行评分。在此,55名儿童(34.3%)被认为参与了假想同伴游戏。假想同伴类型与儿童和假想同伴关系的质量之间没有关联。有隐形朋友的儿童比有拟人化物体的儿童获得更多积极提名。与具有等级关系的儿童相比,具有平等关系的儿童获得更多积极提名和受欢迎程度提名,但负面提名和不受欢迎提名更少。与具有等级关系的儿童相比,教师对具有平等关系的儿童的社交能力评分更高。结果表明,假想同伴类型和关系质量可能代表了假想同伴的不同维度,这促使人们关注假想同伴类型和关系质量在社会功能方面的不同潜在机制。