Gleason T R, Sebanc A M, Hartup W W
Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, USA.
Dev Psychol. 2000 Jul;36(4):419-28.
The developmental significance of preschool children's imaginary companions was examined. Mothers of 78 children were interviewed about their children's social environments and imaginary companions (if their children had them). Results revealed differences between invisible companions and personified objects (e.g., stuffed animals or dolls) in terms of the pretend friends' stability and ubiquity, identity, and relationship with the child. Relationships with invisible companions were mostly described as sociable and friendly, whereas personified objects were usually nurtured. Mothers reported that personification of objects frequently occurred as a result of acquiring a toy, whereas invisible friends were often viewed as fulfilling a need for a relationship. Compared to children without imaginary companions, children with imaginary companions were more likely to be firstborn and only children.
研究了学前儿童假想同伴的发展意义。对78名儿童的母亲进行了访谈,询问她们孩子的社交环境和假想同伴(如果孩子有假想同伴的话)。结果显示,在假想朋友的稳定性、普遍性、身份以及与孩子的关系方面,无形同伴和拟人化物体(如填充动物玩具或玩偶)之间存在差异。与无形同伴的关系大多被描述为善于社交和友好,而拟人化物体通常是被呵护的对象。母亲们报告说,物体拟人化经常是因为获得了一个玩具,而无形朋友通常被视为满足了对人际关系的需求。与没有假想同伴的孩子相比,有假想同伴的孩子更有可能是头胎出生的孩子和独生子女。