Baker Stevenson, Vieweg Paula, Gao Fuqiang, Gilboa Asaf, Wolbers Thomas, Black Sandra E, Rosenbaum R Shayna
Department of Psychology and Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.
Aging and Cognition Research Group, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg 39120, Germany.
Curr Biol. 2016 Oct 10;26(19):2629-2634. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.081. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
Our day-to-day experiences are often similar to one another, occurring in the same place at the same time of day, with common people and objects, and with a shared purpose. Humans have an episodic memory to represent unique, personal events that are rich in detail [1]. For this to occur, at least two basic neural mechanisms are required: one to orthogonalize or "separate" overlapping input patterns at encoding and another to reinstate or "complete" memories from partial cues at retrieval [2-6]. To what extent do these purported "pattern separation" and "pattern completion" mechanisms rely on distinct subfields of the hippocampus [6]? Computational models [4-6] and lesion and genetic studies in rodents [7-12] largely point to the dentate gyrus as responsible for pattern separation and the CA3 and CA1 subfields for pattern completion (but see [13-16]). In high-resolution fMRI studies of humans, behavioral discrimination and completion tasks designed to approximate pattern separation and pattern completion, respectively, elicit the predicted pattern of activity in the dentate gyrus and CA3/CA1 [17-21]. Likewise, impaired behavioral discrimination has been demonstrated in individuals with hippocampal lesions [22, 23], but the lesions most likely encompass other subfields. Examination of these processes in individuals with selective lesions to hippocampal subfields is needed to infer causation [19]. Here, we report the rare case of BL, a 54-year-old man with bilateral ischemic lesions to the hippocampus [24] primarily affecting the dentate gyrus. Studying BL provides the unique opportunity to directly evaluate theories of hippocampal function that assign the dentate gyrus a specific role in discriminating old from new memories.
我们的日常经历往往彼此相似,发生在一天中的同一时间、同一地点,涉及普通的人和事物,并且具有共同的目的。人类拥有情景记忆来表征独特的、细节丰富的个人事件[1]。要实现这一点,至少需要两种基本的神经机制:一种在编码时使重叠的输入模式正交化或“分离”,另一种在检索时从部分线索中恢复或“完成”记忆[2-6]。这些所谓的“模式分离”和“模式完成”机制在多大程度上依赖于海马体的不同子区域[6]?计算模型[4-6]以及啮齿动物的损伤和基因研究[7-12]在很大程度上表明齿状回负责模式分离,而CA3和CA1子区域负责模式完成(但见[13-16])。在对人类的高分辨率功能磁共振成像研究中,分别旨在近似模式分离和模式完成的行为辨别和完成任务,会在齿状回和CA3/CA1中引发预测的活动模式[17-21]。同样,海马体损伤的个体已被证明存在行为辨别受损的情况[22, 23],但这些损伤很可能还涉及其他子区域。需要对海马体子区域有选择性损伤的个体进行这些过程的研究,以推断因果关系[19]。在此,我们报告了BL这个罕见病例,一名54岁男性,双侧海马体存在缺血性损伤[24],主要影响齿状回。对BL的研究提供了一个独特的机会,可以直接评估将齿状回在区分新旧记忆中赋予特定作用的海马体功能理论。