Mercator Research Group "Structure of Memory", Ruhr-Universität Bochum Bochum, Germany ; Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr-Universität Bochum Bochum, Germany.
Front Neural Circuits. 2013 May 6;7:88. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2013.00088. eCollection 2013.
Over the past four decades, a "standard framework" has emerged to explain the neural mechanisms of episodic memory storage. This framework has been instrumental in driving hippocampal research forward and now dominates the design and interpretation of experimental and theoretical studies. It postulates that cortical inputs drive plasticity in the recurrent cornu ammonis 3 (CA3) synapses to rapidly imprint memories as attractor states in CA3. Here we review a range of experimental studies and argue that the evidence against the standard framework is mounting, notwithstanding the considerable evidence in its support. We propose CRISP as an alternative theory to the standard framework. CRISP is based on Context Reset by dentate gyrus (DG), Intrinsic Sequences in CA3, and Pattern completion in cornu ammonis 1 (CA1). Compared to previous models, CRISP uses a radically different mechanism for storing episodic memories in the hippocampus. Neural sequences are intrinsic to CA3, and inputs are mapped onto these intrinsic sequences through synaptic plasticity in the feedforward projections of the hippocampus. Hence, CRISP does not require plasticity in the recurrent CA3 synapses during the storage process. Like in other theories DG and CA1 play supporting roles, however, their function in CRISP have distinct implications. For instance, CA1 performs pattern completion in the absence of CA3 and DG contributes to episodic memory retrieval, increasing the speed, precision, and robustness of retrieval. We propose the conceptual theory, discuss its implications for experimental results and suggest testable predictions. It appears that CRISP not only accounts for those experimental results that are consistent with the standard framework, but also for results that are at odds with the standard framework. We therefore suggest that CRISP is a viable, and perhaps superior, theory for the hippocampal function in episodic memory.
在过去的四十年中,出现了一种“标准框架”来解释情景记忆存储的神经机制。该框架对于推动海马体研究向前发展起到了重要作用,现在主导着实验和理论研究的设计和解释。它假设皮质输入驱动 CA3 中的反复角回 3(CA3)突触的可塑性,以快速将记忆作为 CA3 中的吸引状态进行印记。在这里,我们回顾了一系列实验研究,并认为尽管有大量证据支持该标准框架,但反对该标准框架的证据越来越多。我们提出 CRISP 作为该标准框架的替代理论。CRISP 基于齿状回(DG)的上下文重置、CA3 中的内在序列和 CA1 中的模式完成。与以前的模型相比,CRISP 使用了一种截然不同的机制来在海马体中存储情景记忆。神经序列是 CA3 固有的,输入通过海马体的前馈投射中的突触可塑性映射到这些内在序列上。因此,在存储过程中不需要 CA3 的反复突触可塑性。与其他理论一样,DG 和 CA1 起着支持作用,但其在 CRISP 中的功能具有不同的意义。例如,在没有 CA3 和 DG 的情况下,CA1 执行模式完成,并且 DG 有助于情景记忆检索,从而提高检索的速度、精度和鲁棒性。我们提出了概念理论,讨论了其对实验结果的影响,并提出了可测试的预测。似乎 CRISP 不仅解释了与标准框架一致的那些实验结果,而且还解释了与标准框架不一致的那些实验结果。因此,我们建议 CRISP 是一种可行的、甚至可能更优越的情景记忆海马体功能理论。