Turjanmaa K, Reunala T
Department of Dermatology, University Central Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Contact Dermatitis. 1989 May;20(5):360-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1989.tb03173.x.
To examine the occurrence of latex allergen in condoms and to study the symptoms caused by contact with condoms, 46 patients with latex-glove contact urticaria (LGCU) were investigated. 7 (24%) of the 29 patients with a history of condom use had experienced local swelling and/or pruritus during intercourse, confirming that condoms can cause local symptoms in latex allergic subjects. Prick tests performed on 16 different condom brands showed that 4 brands caused positive reactions in 52-67% of patients. The remaining 12 brands were not as allergenic and 1 brand was totally negative on prick testing. 1 highly allergenic condom brand was examined by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), which showed similar protein profiles to those detectable in latex gloves and natural rubber. These results show that, in addition to rubber gloves and balloons, condoms should also be considered as possible sources of latex, and that patients with LGCU should be advised to avoid condoms.
为了检测避孕套中乳胶过敏原的存在情况,并研究接触避孕套所引起的症状,我们对46例乳胶手套接触性荨麻疹(LGCU)患者进行了调查。在29例有使用避孕套史的患者中,有7例(24%)在性交过程中出现了局部肿胀和/或瘙痒,证实避孕套可在乳胶过敏者中引起局部症状。对16个不同品牌的避孕套进行的点刺试验表明,4个品牌在52%至67%的患者中引起了阳性反应。其余12个品牌的致敏性较低,1个品牌的点刺试验结果完全为阴性。对1个高致敏性避孕套品牌进行了高压液相色谱(HPLC)检测,结果显示其蛋白质谱与乳胶手套和天然橡胶中可检测到的蛋白质谱相似。这些结果表明,除了橡胶手套和气球外,避孕套也应被视为乳胶的可能来源,对于LGCU患者,应建议其避免使用避孕套。