Pickard Frank C, König Gerhard, Simmonett Andrew C, Shao Yihan, Brooks Bernard R
National Institutes of Health - National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Laboratory of Computational Biology, 5635 Fishers Lane, T-900 Suite, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
National Institutes of Health - National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Laboratory of Computational Biology, 5635 Fishers Lane, T-900 Suite, Rockville, MD 20852, USA; Max Planck Institut für Kohlenforschung, 45470 Mülheim an der Ruhr, NRW, Germany.
Bioorg Med Chem. 2016 Oct 15;24(20):4988-4997. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2016.08.031. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
The non-Boltzmann Bennett (NBB) free energy estimator method is applied to 21 molecules from the blind subset of the SAMPL4 challenge. When NBB is applied with the SMD implicit solvent model, and the OLYP/DZP level of quantum chemistry, highly accurate hydration free energy calculations are obtained with respect to experiment (RMSD=0.89kcal·mol). Other quantum chemical methods are also tested, and the effects of solvent model, density functional, basis set are explored in this benchmarking study, providing a framework for improvements in calculating hydration free energies. We provide a practical guide for using the best QM-NBB protocols that are consistently more accurate than either pure QM or pure MM alone. In situations where high accuracy hydration free energy predictions are needed, the QM-NBB method with SMD implicit solvent should be the first choice of quantum chemists.
非玻尔兹曼贝内特(NBB)自由能估算方法被应用于SAMPL4挑战盲选子集中的21个分子。当NBB与SMD隐式溶剂模型以及OLYP/DZP量子化学水平一起应用时,相对于实验可获得高精度的水合自由能计算结果(均方根偏差=0.89千卡·摩尔)。还测试了其他量子化学方法,并在本基准研究中探索了溶剂模型、密度泛函、基组的影响,为改进水合自由能计算提供了一个框架。我们提供了一份实用指南,介绍使用始终比单独的纯量子力学(QM)或纯分子力学(MM)更准确的最佳QM-NBB协议。在需要高精度水合自由能预测的情况下,采用SMD隐式溶剂的QM-NBB方法应该是量子化学家的首选。