Jayawardena Ravini, Winskel Heather
Psychology, Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, NSW 2450, Australia.
Psychology, Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, NSW 2450, Australia.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Nov;171:65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
The current study aimed to test the applicability of the modified receptive field (MRF) theory (Tydgat & Grainger, 2009) with English native speakers (Experiment 1) and Sinhalese native speakers (Experiment 2), who were skilled readers of both Sinhala and Roman scripts. A two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) procedure to measure identification accuracy for all positions in a string of five characters, which consisted of Roman script letters, Sinhala letters or symbols was conducted. For Roman script, the English and Sinhalese speakers displayed analogous results as in previous studies for Roman letters and symbols (i.e., an initial letter advantage and W-shaped function for Roman letters and a Λ-shaped function for symbols). In contrast for Sinhala script, the Sinhalese speakers displayed a strong linear function with accuracy for letter positions 1, 2 and 3 similarly advantaged. We propose that this characteristic pattern for Sinhala script has developed as a specialised adaptive mechanism to optimise the processing of letters when reading in this distinctive script.
本研究旨在测试修正感受野(MRF)理论(泰德加特和格兰杰,2009年)对以英语为母语者(实验1)和以僧伽罗语为母语者(实验2)的适用性,这些人都是僧伽罗文和罗马文的熟练读者。采用二选一强制选择(2AFC)程序,测量由罗马文字母、僧伽罗字母或符号组成的五个字符串中所有位置的识别准确率。对于罗马文字,英语和僧伽罗语使用者的结果与之前关于罗马字母和符号的研究类似(即,罗马字母有首字母优势和W形函数,符号有Λ形函数)。相比之下,对于僧伽罗文字,僧伽罗语使用者表现出强烈的线性函数,第1、2和3个字母位置的准确率同样具有优势。我们认为,僧伽罗文字的这种特征模式是作为一种专门的自适应机制发展而来的,以便在阅读这种独特文字时优化字母处理。