Winskel Heather, Kim Tae-Hoon, Cho Jeung-Ryeul
Psychology, Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, NSW 2450, Australia.
Psychology, Kyungnam University, Changwon, South Korea.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Jun;187:30-36. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 May 12.
The aim was to investigate whether native English speakers (Experiment 1) and native Korean speakers (Experiment 2) processed familiar letters in an analytic manner in comparison to unfamiliar letters or symbols. Participants performed a two-alternative-forced-choice identification task with Roman, Korean Hangul and Thai Navon compound letters (large letters made up of small letters). The English speakers were familiar with Roman script but not Korean or Thai, whereas the Korean speakers were familiar with Korean and Roman script but not Thai. The global precedence effect (GPE), an indication of holistic processing, is characterised by a global advantage (global processing is faster than local processing) and asymmetric congruence (global processing interferes with the processing of local features). Based on previous research, it was predicted that there would be a global precedence effect for unfamiliar but not familiar letters. Results from the English speakers did not support this prediction as we found a GPE for familiar Roman as well as unfamiliar Thai letters but not for unfamiliar Korean letters. In contrast, for the Korean speakers, we found support for the prediction as we found a GPE for Thai letters but not for familiar Korean and Roman letters. Based on this evidence, we propose that the Koreans are processing Korean and Roman letters in a more analytic manner than the English native speakers for Roman script. Due to the characteristics of Korean Hangul, Korean readers may be processing letters in a more analytic manner than the English readers.
本研究旨在调查以英语为母语者(实验1)和以韩语为母语者(实验2)在处理熟悉字母时,相较于不熟悉的字母或符号,是否采用分析性方式。参与者对罗马字母、韩语谚文和泰语纳冯复合字母(由小字母组成的大字母)进行二选一的识别任务。说英语者熟悉罗马文字,但不熟悉韩语或泰语,而说韩语者熟悉韩语和罗马文字,但不熟悉泰语。整体优先效应(GPE)是整体加工的一种表现,其特征为整体优势(整体加工比局部加工更快)和不对称一致性(整体加工会干扰局部特征的加工)。基于先前的研究,预计不熟悉的字母会出现整体优先效应,而熟悉的字母则不会。说英语者的结果不支持这一预测,因为我们发现熟悉的罗马字母以及不熟悉的泰语字母都存在整体优先效应,而不熟悉的韩语字母则没有。相比之下,对于说韩语者,我们发现该预测得到了支持,因为我们发现泰语字母存在整体优先效应,而熟悉的韩语和罗马字母则没有。基于这一证据,我们提出,对于罗马文字,韩国人处理韩语和罗马字母的方式比以英语为母语者更具分析性。由于韩语谚文的特点,韩国读者处理字母的方式可能比英语读者更具分析性。