Dawkins-Moultin Lenna, McDonald Andrea, McKyer Lisako
a Department of Health & Kinesiology , Texas A&M University , College Station , Texas , USA.
b Department of Health Promotion and Community Health Sciences , Texas A&M University , College Station , Texas , USA.
J Health Commun. 2016;21(sup2):30-35. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1196273. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
While health literacy research has experienced tremendous growth in the last two decades, the field still struggles to devise interventions that lead to lasting change. Most health literacy interventions are at the individual level and focus on resolving clinician-patient communication difficulties. As a result, the interventions use a deficit model that treats health literacy as a patient problem that needs to be fixed or circumvented. We propose that public health health literacy interventions integrate the principles of socioecology and critical pedagogy to develop interventions that build capacity and empower individuals and communities. Socioecology operates on the premise that health outcome is hinged on the interplay between individuals and their environment. Critical pedagogy assumes education is inherently political, and the ultimate goal of education is social change. Integrating these two approaches will provide a useful frame in which to develop interventions that move beyond the individual level.
尽管健康素养研究在过去二十年中取得了巨大发展,但该领域仍难以设计出能带来持久改变的干预措施。大多数健康素养干预措施都在个体层面,侧重于解决临床医患沟通困难。因此,这些干预措施采用了一种缺陷模型,将健康素养视为一个需要解决或规避的患者问题。我们建议公共卫生健康素养干预措施整合社会生态学和批判教育学的原则,以开发能够增强能力并赋予个人和社区权力的干预措施。社会生态学基于这样一个前提,即健康结果取决于个体与其环境之间的相互作用。批判教育学认为教育本质上是政治性的,教育的最终目标是社会变革。将这两种方法结合起来将提供一个有用的框架,在此框架内开发超越个体层面的干预措施。