Muscat Danielle M, Shepherd Heather L, Nutbeam Don, Morony Suzanne, Smith Sian K, Dhillon Haryana M, Trevenal Lyndal, Hayen Andrew, Luxford Karen, McCaffery Kirsten
Health Lit Res Pract. 2017 Dec 11;1(4):e257-e268. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20171208-02. eCollection 2017 Oct.
Health literacy skills are often assessed in relation to written health materials; however, many important communications are in other formats, especially verbal communication with health care providers.
This qualitative study sought to examine adult learners' experiences of developing verbal health literacy skills within an Australian adult basic education program, and to explore verbal communication and shared decision-making as a constituent domain of health literacy.
We conducted a semi-structured qualitative interview study between September and November 2014 with adult learners who had participated in a single-semester health literacy program that included an integrated shared decision-making component. We analyzed interviews using the Framework method; a matrix-based approach to thematic analysis. A hybrid process of inductive and deductive coding was used to interpret raw data.
Interviewees were 22 students from six health literacy classes and ranged in age from 18 to 74 years (mean, 48.3). The majority were women ( = 15) and born outside Australia ( = 13). Health literacy was generally limited according to the Newest Vital Sign screening tool ( = 17). The health literacy program appeared to serve two key functions. First, it stimulated awareness that patients have the right to participate in decision-making concerning their treatment and care. Second, it facilitated verbal skill development across the domains of functional (e.g., communicating symptoms), communicative (e.g., asking questions to extract information about treatment options), and critical (e.g., integrating new knowledge with preferences) health literacy.
Our findings support the conceptualization of health literacy as a modifiable health asset that is subject to change and improvement as a result of deliberate intervention. Results reinforce verbal health literacy as an important component of health literacy, and draw attention to the hierarchy of verbal skills needed for consumers to become more actively involved in decisions about their health. We present a revised model of health literacy based on our findings. .
We developed a health literacy program for adults with lower literacy to help learners develop skills to talk to health care providers and share health decisions. The program was taught in Australian adult education settings. The article explores the range of health literacy skills needed for communication and decision-making in this study, and presents a model in which verbal skills are an important part of health literacy.
健康素养技能通常是根据书面健康材料进行评估的;然而,许多重要的沟通是以其他形式进行的,尤其是与医疗服务提供者的口头沟通。
这项定性研究旨在考察成年学习者在澳大利亚成人基础教育项目中发展口头健康素养技能的经历,并探讨口头沟通和共同决策作为健康素养的一个构成领域。
2014年9月至11月,我们对参与了一个单学期健康素养项目的成年学习者进行了半结构化定性访谈研究,该项目包括一个综合的共同决策部分。我们使用框架法分析访谈内容;这是一种基于矩阵的主题分析方法。采用归纳和演绎编码的混合过程来解释原始数据。
受访者是来自六个健康素养班级的22名学生,年龄在18岁至74岁之间(平均48.3岁)。大多数是女性(15名),出生在澳大利亚境外(13名)。根据最新生命体征筛查工具,健康素养普遍有限(17名)。健康素养项目似乎发挥了两个关键作用。第一,它激发了人们对患者有权参与有关其治疗和护理决策的认识。第二,它促进了功能性(如交流症状)、沟通性(如提问以获取有关治疗选择的信息)和批判性(如将新知识与个人偏好相结合)健康素养领域的口头技能发展。
我们的研究结果支持将健康素养概念化为一种可改变的健康资产,通过刻意干预可以发生变化并得到改善。结果强化了口头健康素养是健康素养的一个重要组成部分,并提请注意消费者更积极参与自身健康决策所需的口头技能层次结构。我们根据研究结果提出了一个修订后的健康素养模型。
我们为低素养成年人开发了一个健康素养项目,以帮助学习者培养与医疗服务提供者交谈并共享健康决策的技能。该项目在澳大利亚成人教育环境中授课。本文探讨了本研究中沟通和决策所需的健康素养技能范围,并提出了一个模型,其中口头技能是健康素养的重要组成部分。