• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整合参与式设计与健康素养以改善研究与干预措施。

Integrating Participatory Design and Health Literacy to Improve Research and Interventions.

作者信息

Neuhauser Linda

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;240:303-329.

PMID:28972525
Abstract

Health communication is an essential health promotion strategy to convert scientific findings into actionable, empowering information for the public. Health communication interventions have shown positive outcomes, but many efforts have been disappointing. A key weakness is that expert-designed health communication is often overly generic and not adequately aligned with the abilities, preferences and life situations of specific audiences. The emergence of the field of health literacy is providing powerful theoretical guidance and practice strategies. Health literacy, in concert with other determinants of health, has greatly advanced understanding of factors that facilitate or hinder health promotion at individual, organizational and community settings. However, health literacy models are incomplete and interventions have shown only modest success to date. A challenge is to move beyond the current focus on individual comprehension and address deeper factors of motivation, self-efficacy and empowerment, as well as socio-environmental influences, and their impact to improve health outcomes and reduce health disparities. Integrating participatory design theory and methods drawn from social sciences and design sciences can significantly improve health literacy models and interventions. Likewise, researchers and practitioners using participatory design can greatly benefit from incorporating health literacy principles into their efforts. Such interventions at multiple levels are showing positive health outcomes and reduction of health disparities, but this approach is complex and not yet widespread. This chapter focuses on research findings about health literacy and participatory design to improve health promotion, and practical guidance and case examples for researchers, practitioners and policymakers.

摘要

健康传播是一项至关重要的健康促进策略,旨在将科学发现转化为公众可采取行动的、具有赋能作用的信息。健康传播干预已显示出积极成果,但许多努力却令人失望。一个关键弱点在于,专家设计的健康传播往往过于笼统,与特定受众的能力、偏好和生活状况不够契合。健康素养领域的出现提供了强有力的理论指导和实践策略。健康素养与其他健康决定因素共同作用,极大地推动了人们对在个体、组织和社区层面促进或阻碍健康促进的因素的理解。然而,健康素养模型并不完善,迄今为止干预措施仅取得了有限的成功。一项挑战是超越当前对个体理解的关注,解决动机、自我效能感和赋能等更深层次的因素,以及社会环境影响及其对改善健康结果和减少健康差距的影响。整合源自社会科学和设计科学的参与式设计理论与方法,能够显著改进健康素养模型和干预措施。同样,运用参与式设计的研究人员和从业者可通过将健康素养原则纳入其工作而受益匪浅。这种多层次干预正显示出积极的健康成果并减少健康差距,但这种方法较为复杂,尚未广泛应用。本章重点介绍有关健康素养和参与式设计以改善健康促进的研究结果,以及为研究人员、从业者和政策制定者提供的实践指导和案例。

相似文献

1
Integrating Participatory Design and Health Literacy to Improve Research and Interventions.整合参与式设计与健康素养以改善研究与干预措施。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;240:303-329.
2
Improving organizational capacity to address health literacy in public health: a rapid realist review.提高公共卫生领域健康素养的组织能力:快速务实的综述。
Public Health. 2014 Jun;128(6):515-24. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
3
Seeking an Expanded, Multidimensional Conceptual Approach to Health Literacy and Health Disparities Research.寻求一种扩展的、多维度的健康素养与健康差距研究概念方法。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;240:96-123.
4
The Relevance of Health Literacy to mHealth.健康素养与移动健康的相关性。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;240:347-355.
5
Integrating the Principles of Socioecology and Critical Pedagogy for Health Promotion Health Literacy Interventions.将社会生态学和批判教育学原理整合到健康促进健康素养干预中。
J Health Commun. 2016;21(sup2):30-35. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1196273. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
6
Health Literacy in Selected Populations: Individuals, Families, and Communities from the International and Cultural Perspective.特定人群的健康素养:从国际和文化视角看个人、家庭及社区
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;240:392-414.
7
Shared Decision Making Interventions: Theoretical and Empirical Evidence with Implications for Health Literacy.共同决策干预措施:理论与实证证据及其对健康素养的启示
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;240:263-283.
8
Using co-design to develop interventions to address health literacy needs in a hospitalised population.运用协同设计来开发干预措施,以满足住院患者的健康素养需求。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 20;18(1):989. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3801-7.
9
How can communities and organisations improve their health literacy?社区和组织如何提高其健康素养?
Public Health Res Pract. 2018 Jun 14;28(2):2821809. doi: 10.17061/phrp2821809.
10
Assisting Vulnerable Communities: Canyon Ranch Institute's and Health Literacy Media's Health Literacy and Community-Based Interventions.协助弱势群体:峡谷牧场研究所与健康素养媒体的健康素养及基于社区的干预措施。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;240:127-143.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and evaluation of the patient engagement questionnaire (PEQ).患者参与度问卷(PEQ)的开发与评估。
PEC Innov. 2025 Apr 14;6:100392. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100392. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Occupational health literacy and work ability: a moderation analysis including interpersonal and organizational factors in healthy organizations.职业健康素养与工作能力:健康组织中人际关系和组织因素的调节分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 7;12:1243138. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1243138. eCollection 2024.
3
The design of the Deaf in Touch Everywhere (DITE) mobile application with Deaf and interpreter communities in Malaysia.
马来西亚失聪者与口译员社区共同设计的“随时随地触摸失聪者”(DITE)移动应用程序。
Digit Health. 2024 Feb 7;10:20552076241228432. doi: 10.1177/20552076241228432. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Participatory design of an infographic to help support the care of people living with complex regional pain syndrome.参与式设计信息图以帮助支持复杂性区域疼痛综合征患者的护理。
Br J Pain. 2023 Dec;17(6):519-531. doi: 10.1177/20494637231190587. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
5
Systematic review on the effectiveness of mobile health applications on mental health of breast cancer survivors.关于移动健康应用程序对乳腺癌幸存者心理健康有效性的系统评价。
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Feb;19(1):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01470-6. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
6
Development and pilot testing a communication simulation training for interpreters to improve pain communication between primary care providers and patients with limited English proficiency.开发并初步测试一种针对口译员的沟通模拟培训,以改善初级保健提供者与英语水平有限的患者之间的疼痛沟通。
PEC Innov. 2023 Sep 20;3:100217. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100217. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.
7
Participatory Design and Evaluation of the "Stem Cells Australia" Website for Delivering Complex Health Knowledge: Mixed Methods Study.参与式设计和评估“澳大利亚干细胞”网站以提供复杂健康知识:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 20;25:e44733. doi: 10.2196/44733.
8
Developing a Digital Medication Adherence Intervention for and With Patients With Asthma and Low Health Literacy: Protocol for a Participatory Design Approach.为健康素养较低的哮喘患者开发并与他们共同参与的数字药物依从性干预措施:参与式设计方法方案
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Apr 12;7:e35112. doi: 10.2196/35112.
9
Cancer literacy among Jordanian colorectal cancer survivors and informal carers: Qualitative explorations.约旦结直肠癌幸存者和非正式照护者的癌症知识水平:定性探讨。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 20;11:1116882. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1116882. eCollection 2023.
10
Community Perceptions of Arsenic Contaminated Drinking Water and Preferences for Risk Communication in California's San Joaquin Valley.社区对砷污染饮用水的看法以及对加利福尼亚州圣华金河谷风险沟通的偏好。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 1;20(1):813. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010813.