Frykman Philip K, Freedman Andrew L, Kane Timothy D, Cheng Zhi, Petrosyan Mikael, Catchpole Kenneth
1 Division of Pediatric Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center , Los Angeles, California.
2 Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center , Los Angeles, California.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Feb;27(2):191-196. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0225. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
We studied operating team acceptability of Video Telescopic Monitor (VITOM) exoscope by exploring the ease of use of the device in two centers. We also assessed factors affecting surgeon musculoskeletal discomfort.
We focused on how the operating team interacted with the VITOM system with surrogate measures of usefulness, image quality, ease of use, workload, and setup time. Multivariable linear regression was used to model the relationships between team role, experience, and setup time. Relationships between localized musculoskeletal discomfort and use of VITOM alone, and with loupes, were also analyzed.
Four surgeons, 7 surgical techs, 7 circulating nurses, and 13 surgical residents performed 70 pediatric surgical and urological operations. We found that subjective views of each team member were consistently positive with 69%-74% agreed or strongly agreed that VITOM enhanced their ability to perform their job and improved the surgical process. Unexpectedly, the scrub techs and nurses perceived more value and utility of VITOM, presumably because it provides them a view of the operative field that would otherwise be unavailable to them. Team members rated perceptions of image quality highly and workload generally satisfactory. Not surprisingly, setup time decreased with team experience and multivariable modeling showed significant correlations with surgeon and surgical tech experience, but not circulating nurse. An important finding was that surgeon neck discomfort was reduced with use of VITOM alone for magnification, compared with use of loupes and VITOM. The most likely explanation for these findings is improved posture with the neck at a neutral position when viewing the VITOM images, compared with neck flexion with loupes, and thus, a less favorable ergonomic position.
This study suggests that there may be small drawbacks associated with VITOM use initially, but these reduce with increased experience and benefit both the surgeon and the rest of the team.
我们通过在两个中心探索视频伸缩式显示器(VITOM)外视镜的易用性,研究了手术团队对其的接受程度。我们还评估了影响外科医生肌肉骨骼不适的因素。
我们通过有用性、图像质量、易用性、工作量和设置时间等替代指标,重点研究了手术团队与VITOM系统的交互情况。使用多变量线性回归来建立团队角色、经验和设置时间之间的关系模型。还分析了局部肌肉骨骼不适与单独使用VITOM以及与头戴放大镜联合使用之间的关系。
4名外科医生、7名手术技师、7名巡回护士和13名外科住院医师共进行了70例儿科外科和泌尿外科手术。我们发现每个团队成员的主观评价一直是积极的,69%-74%的人同意或强烈同意VITOM增强了他们的工作能力并改善了手术过程。出乎意料的是,刷手技师和护士认为VITOM更有价值和实用性,可能是因为它为他们提供了一个原本无法看到的手术视野。团队成员对图像质量评价很高,对工作量总体满意。不出所料,设置时间随着团队经验的增加而减少,多变量建模显示与外科医生和手术技师的经验有显著相关性,但与巡回护士无关。一个重要的发现是,与使用头戴放大镜和VITOM相比,仅使用VITOM进行放大时,外科医生的颈部不适有所减轻。这些发现最可能的解释是,与使用头戴放大镜时颈部弯曲相比,观看VITOM图像时颈部处于中立位置,姿势得到改善,因此人体工程学位置更有利。
这项研究表明,最初使用VITOM可能存在一些小缺点,但随着经验的增加这些缺点会减少,对外科医生和团队其他成员都有益。