Olds Kelly, Byard Roger W, Winskog Calle, Langlois Neil E I
School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Frome Road, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Forensic Science SA, GPO Box 2790, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2016 Dec;12(4):435-443. doi: 10.1007/s12024-016-9813-x. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
Alternate light sources such as ultraviolet, narrow band, and infrared have been used in an attempt to reveal the presence of bruising that is not otherwise apparent (inapparent). The following study evaluates the ability of alternate light sources to enhance visibility of bruises by employing an objective assessment of digital photography images in conjunction with histology. A pigskin model was employed with bruises created by injection of blood to be not visible or barely visible (inapparent) under white light. The pigskin was photographed using alternate light source illumination. Images were assessed using the program Fiji to measure enhancement in terms of bruise length (cm). Photography results were compared with histology to confirm the presence of bruising. Violet and blue light sources produced the greatest enhancement, both with a p < 0.0001. Regions that were not bruises were also enhanced with light sources in this study, indicating that light sources are not specific, and that their use to enhance the visibility of bruising should be undertaken with caution.
诸如紫外线、窄带光和红外线等替代光源已被用于试图揭示那些在其他情况下不明显(隐匿性)的瘀伤的存在。以下研究通过结合组织学对数码摄影图像进行客观评估,来评估替代光源增强瘀伤可见性的能力。采用猪皮模型,通过注射血液造成瘀伤,使其在白光下不可见或几乎不可见(隐匿性)。使用替代光源照明对猪皮进行拍照。使用 Fiji 程序评估图像,以瘀伤长度(厘米)来衡量增强效果。将摄影结果与组织学结果进行比较,以确认瘀伤的存在。紫光和蓝光光源产生的增强效果最为显著,两者的 p 值均 < 0.0001。在本研究中,非瘀伤区域也被光源增强,这表明光源不具有特异性,应谨慎使用它们来增强瘀伤的可见性。