Suppr超能文献

我们能否记录配药行为?一项系统评价。

Can we document the practice of dispensing? A systematic review.

作者信息

Cerqueira Santos S, Boaventura T C, Rocha K S S, de Oliveira Filho A D, Onozato T, de Lyra D P

机构信息

Laboratory of Teaching and Research in Social Pharmacy (LEPFS), Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, SE, Brazil.

出版信息

J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016 Dec;41(6):634-644. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12462. Epub 2016 Sep 27.

Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN

Documentation is a process indicator utilized to evaluate quality clinical pharmacist services. In this framework, documentation of dispensing, besides supporting patient care, allows evaluation of the impact of counselling.

OBJECTIVE

To identify and assess studies of documentation by pharmacists in the dispensing process.

METHOD

A systematic review was carried out according to the following steps: (i) identification of studies in the following databases: PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Scopus and Lilacs, using the descriptors 'counselling', 'dispensing', 'community pharmacy services', 'pharmacies' and 'pharmacists' in different combinations; (ii) evaluation of studies, in which the title, abstract and full text of the studies, and the evaluation of the methodological quality of the selected studies were analysed.

RESULTS

In total, 26 articles met the specific criteria. Few studies addressed documentation as part of the dispensing working process (3), and 16 articles reported documentation using non-electronic systems. The main variables documented were patient information, drug therapy problems and clinical interventions. Furthermore, 20 studies showed the effects of documentation in the dispensing process and 23 studies included statistical evidence. Eight articles met between 42% and 75% of the 28 items recommended by the STROBE initiative, and two articles met approximately 60% of the 36 items recommended by the CONSORT initiative.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Few studies address documentation as part of the dispensing working process. Thus, researchers should be concerned with standardizing documentation and implementing more robust designs and multicenter studies.

摘要

已知信息

文件记录是用于评估临床药师优质服务的一项过程指标。在此框架下,调配记录除了支持患者护理外,还能评估咨询的影响。

目的

识别并评估药师在调配过程中进行文件记录的研究。

方法

按照以下步骤进行系统综述:(i)在以下数据库中识别研究:PubMed/Medline、科学网、Scopus和Lilacs,使用“咨询”“调配”“社区药房服务”“药房”和“药师”等描述词进行不同组合检索;(ii)对研究进行评估,分析研究的标题、摘要和全文,并评估所选研究的方法学质量。

结果

共有26篇文章符合特定标准。很少有研究将文件记录作为调配工作过程的一部分进行探讨(3篇),16篇文章报告了使用非电子系统的文件记录情况。记录的主要变量包括患者信息、药物治疗问题和临床干预措施。此外,20项研究显示了调配过程中文件记录的效果,23项研究包含统计证据。8篇文章符合STROBE倡议推荐的28项条目中的42%至75%,2篇文章符合CONSORT倡议推荐的36项条目中的约60%。

新内容及结论

很少有研究将文件记录作为调配工作过程的一部分进行探讨。因此,研究人员应关注文件记录的标准化,并开展更稳健的设计和多中心研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验