• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物配发是否能改善在社区药房就诊的患者的健康结果?系统评价。

Does drug dispensing improve the health outcomes of patients attending community pharmacies? A systematic review.

机构信息

Research Group on Implementation and Integration of Clinical Pharmacy Services in Brazilian Health System (SUS), Department of Pharmacy and Nutrition, Federal University of Espírito Santo, ES, Alegre, Brazil.

Health Sciences Graduate Program, Graduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Laboratory of Teaching and Research in Social Pharmacy (LEPFS), Federal University of Sergipe, SE, São Cristóvão, Brazil.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 2;21(1):764. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06770-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-021-06770-0
PMID:34340700
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8330087/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Drug dispensing is a clinical pharmacy service that promotes access to medicines and their rational use. However, there is a lack of evidence for the impact of drug dispensing on patients' health outcomes. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess the influence of drug dispensing on the clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes of patients attending community pharmacies.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in April 2021 using PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and Open Thesis. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles according to the eligibility criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using tools from the Joanna Briggs Institute, and the literature was synthesized narratively.

RESULTS

We retrieved 3,685 articles and included nine studies that presented 13 different outcomes. Regarding the design, they were cross-sectional (n = 4), randomized clinical trials (n = 4), and quasi-experimental (n = 1). A positive influence of drug dispensing on health outcomes was demonstrated through six clinical, four humanistic and three economic outcomes. Eight studies (88,9 %) used intermediate outcomes. The assessment of methodological quality was characterized by a lack of clarity and/or lack of information in primary studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Most articles included in this review reported a positive influence of drug dispensing performed by community pharmacists on patients' health outcomes. The findings of this study may be of interest to patients, pharmacists, decision makers, and healthcare systems, since they may contribute to evidence-based decision-making, strengthening the contribution of community pharmacists to health care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020191701 .

摘要

背景

发药是一项促进药物获取和合理使用的临床药学服务。然而,发药对患者健康结果的影响缺乏证据。因此,本研究旨在评估发药对社区药房患者的临床、人文和经济结果的影响。

方法

2021 年 4 月,我们使用 PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane 图书馆、LILACS 和 OpenThesis 进行了系统的文献检索。两名评审员根据入选标准筛选标题、摘要和全文文章。使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所的工具评估方法学质量,并进行叙述性综合。

结果

我们检索到 3685 篇文章,纳入了 9 项研究,这些研究共呈现了 13 种不同的结果。就设计而言,它们是横断面研究(n=4)、随机临床试验(n=4)和准实验研究(n=1)。发药对健康结果的积极影响通过 6 项临床、4 项人文和 3 项经济结果得到了证明。8 项研究(88.9%)使用了中间结果。对方法学质量的评估特点是主要研究中缺乏清晰度和/或缺乏信息。

结论

本综述中纳入的大多数文章报告了社区药剂师发药对患者健康结果的积极影响。本研究的结果可能对患者、药剂师、决策者和医疗保健系统有兴趣,因为它们可能有助于基于证据的决策,加强社区药剂师对医疗保健的贡献。

试验注册

PROSPERO CRD42020191701。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efb2/8330087/29a2f99bdfd3/12913_2021_6770_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efb2/8330087/29a2f99bdfd3/12913_2021_6770_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efb2/8330087/29a2f99bdfd3/12913_2021_6770_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Does drug dispensing improve the health outcomes of patients attending community pharmacies? A systematic review.药物配发是否能改善在社区药房就诊的患者的健康结果?系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 2;21(1):764. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06770-0.
2
Antimicrobial dispensing process in community pharmacies: a scoping review.社区药店的抗菌药物调配流程:范围综述。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Sep 17;11(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01157-0.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Public stewardship of private for-profit healthcare providers in low- and middle-income countries.低收入和中等收入国家对私营营利性医疗服务提供者的公共管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 11;2016(8):CD009855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009855.pub2.
5
Perception of community pharmacists about the work process of drug dispensing: a cross-sectional survey study.社区药剂师对发药工作流程的认知:一项横断面调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 8;22(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07528-y.
6
Can we document the practice of dispensing? A systematic review.我们能否记录配药行为?一项系统评价。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016 Dec;41(6):634-644. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12462. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
7
Impact of Pharmacists' Interventions and Patients' Decision on Health Outcomes in Terms of Medication Adherence and Quality Use of Medicines among Patients Attending Community Pharmacies: A Systematic Review.社区药房中,药师干预和患者决策对药物依从性和药物合理使用的健康结局的影响:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 21;18(9):4392. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094392.
8
[Pharmaceutical regulations in Chad: assessment of drug dispensing practices in private pharmacies in N'Djamena].[乍得的药品法规:恩贾梅纳私人药店药品调配实践评估]
Pan Afr Med J. 2023 Jan 9;44:16. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2023.44.16.37835. eCollection 2023.
9
Identifying health outcomes of pharmaceutical clinical services in patients with cancer: A systematic review.识别癌症患者药物临床服务的健康结果:系统评价。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023 Apr;19(4):591-598. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.12.009. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
10
Evaluation of pharmacist's practices regarding the antimicrobials dispensing: a simulated patient study.评价药师在抗菌药物调配方面的实践:一项模拟患者研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 23;22(1):1576. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08853-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Does drug dispensing influence patients' medication knowledge and medication adherence? A systematic review and meta-analysis.药品调配会影响患者的用药知识和用药依从性吗?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 29;25(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12074-w.
2
The role of large language models in self-care: a study and benchmark on medicines and supplement guidance accuracy.大语言模型在自我护理中的作用:一项关于药物和补充剂指导准确性的研究及基准测试
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Dec 7. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01839-2.
3
ReflACTION framework: A proposed model for implementation of clinical pharmacy services.

本文引用的文献

1
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
2
Effect of pharmacists' interventions on health outcomes of children with asthma: A systematic review.药师干预对哮喘儿童健康结局的影响:系统评价。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2021 May-Jun;61(3):e28-e43. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.01.002. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
3
Impact of pharmacists' training on oral anticoagulant counseling: A randomized controlled trial.
ReflACTION框架:一个关于实施临床药学服务的提议模型。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Oct 22;16:100534. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100534. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Drug dispensing in public community pharmacies: evidence from the MedMinas project.社区药店配药情况:来自 MedMinas 项目的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 6;24(1):1354. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11816-0.
5
Deprescribing NSAIDs: The Potential Role of Community Pharmacists.停用非甾体抗炎药:社区药剂师的潜在作用。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Jul 24;12(4):116. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12040116.
6
"Opportunities and responsibilities": how do pharmacists assess their professionalism?“机遇与责任”:药师如何评价自身的专业性?
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 1;24(1):831. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05767-7.
7
Prescription and dispensing duration of medicines for hypertension and other chronic conditions: a review of international policies and evidence to inform the Australian setting.高血压和其他慢性病药物的处方和配药期限:审查国际政策和证据以为澳大利亚的情况提供信息。
Hypertens Res. 2024 Aug;47(8):2104-2114. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01743-2. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
8
The academic formation challenges: what does retail expect from higher education institutions in pharmacy?学术培养的挑战:零售行业对药学院校有哪些期望?
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 25;24(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05435-w.
9
An online cross-sectional survey of community pharmacists to assess information needs for evidence-based self-medication counselling.一项针对社区药剂师的在线横断面调查,以评估基于证据的自我药疗咨询的信息需求。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2023 Dec;45(6):1452-1463. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01624-7. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
10
Evaluation of the Care Pathway in the Context of the Dispensing of Emicizumab (Hemlibra) in Community Pharmacies in France: Protocol for a Cross-sectional Study Based on the Kirkpatrick Model.法国社区药房中艾美赛珠单抗(Hemlibra)配药背景下护理路径的评估:基于柯克帕特里克模型的横断面研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Mar 8;12:e43091. doi: 10.2196/43091.
药师培训对口服抗凝药物咨询的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 May;104(5):1253-1259. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.09.018. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
4
Clinical and economic impact of medication reconciliation in cancer patients: a systematic review.药物重整对癌症患者的临床和经济影响:一项系统评价
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Aug;28(8):3557-3569. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05400-5. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
5
Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better?主要和次要医学研究的方法学质量(偏倚风险)评估工具:它们是什么,哪个更好?
Mil Med Res. 2020 Feb 29;7(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8.
6
Effect of pharmacist-led interventions on medication adherence and inhalation technique in adult patients with asthma or COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis.药师主导的干预措施对哮喘或 COPD 成年患者药物依从性和吸入技术的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020 Oct;45(5):904-917. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13126. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
7
Drug Related Hospital Admissions; A Systematic Review of the Recent Literatures.与药物相关的住院治疗;近期文献的系统综述
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2019 Oct;7(4):339-346. doi: 10.29252/beat-070401.
8
Assessing insomnia management in community pharmacy setting in Jordan: A simulated patient approach.评估约旦社区药店环境中的失眠管理:一种模拟患者的方法。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 13;14(12):e0226076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226076. eCollection 2019.
9
Patients' Perspective And Usefulness Of Pictograms In Short-Term Antibiotic Therapy - Multicenter, Randomized Trial.患者对短期抗生素治疗中象形图的看法及实用性——多中心随机试验
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Oct 2;13:1667-1676. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S214419. eCollection 2019.
10
Personalized Biofeedback on Inhaler Adherence and Technique by Community Pharmacists: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.社区药剂师提供的关于吸入器依从性和使用技巧的个性化生物反馈:一项整群随机临床试验
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Feb;8(2):635-644. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.09.008. Epub 2019 Sep 27.