Suppr超能文献

社区药剂师对发药工作流程的认知:一项横断面调查研究。

Perception of community pharmacists about the work process of drug dispensing: a cross-sectional survey study.

机构信息

Graduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Sergipe, Avenue Marechal Rondon, Jd. Rosa Elze, São Cristóvão, Sergipe State, Zip code 49100-000, Brazil.

Laboratory of Teaching and Research in Social Pharmacy (LEPFS), Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, Avenue Marechal Rondon, Jd. Rosa Elze, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Zip code 49100-000, Brazil.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 8;22(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07528-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Drug dispensing aims to promote rational medicine use. However, in many countries, the work processes are still not well defined. In this sense, the perception of pharmacists about dispensing practices presents an overview of how the service is being performed in the country and its main challenges. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the self-reported work process of Brazilian community pharmacists in relation to drug dispensing, challenges, and strategies for carrying out the service.

METHOD

A cross-sectional survey was conducted between May and July 2021, with community pharmacists from all regions of Brazil. Pharmacists were invited to answer a validated, self-administered questionnaire, implemented through Google Forms, containing 33 questions related to the steps of drug dispensing (questions and counseling) and the main challenges and strategies to perform the service. The data were exported to Microsoft Office Excel and SPSS®. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to assess the association between responses and demographic information, with a significance level of less than 5% (p < 0.05). This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (number: 4.295.171).

RESULTS

A total of 625 community pharmacists responded to the survey. Most pharmacists reported always or frequently performing 17 (54%) of the 31 steps described in the instrument. The steps that pharmacists reported performing more frequently were forming the medication name (n = 569, 91.04%), verifying the completeness and adequacy of the prescription according to current legislation (n = 567, 90.72%) and providing counseling on dosage (n = 549, 87.84%). Documentation was the main step in which pharmacists reported never or rarely performing (n = 424, 67.84%). The results showed that there was a significant influence of the variables of public education institution, age, and postgraduate education on the frequency of dispensing steps (F(3, 621) = 14.884, p < 0.001; R = 0,063).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that most pharmacists reported always or frequently asking most of the questions and performing counseling contained in the instrument during drug dispensing. These results can contribute to an understanding of current dispensing practices and generate insights for developing strategies to qualify the service.

摘要

背景

发药旨在促进合理用药。然而,在许多国家,工作流程仍未得到很好的定义。在这种情况下,药剂师对发药实践的看法概述了该服务在该国的执行情况及其主要挑战。因此,本研究的目的是确定巴西社区药剂师在药物配发方面的自我报告工作流程、挑战以及开展服务的策略。

方法

2021 年 5 月至 7 月期间,在巴西所有地区进行了一项横断面调查,调查对象为社区药剂师。药剂师被邀请回答一份经过验证的、自我管理的问卷,该问卷通过 Google Forms 实施,包含 33 个与药物配药(问题和咨询)步骤以及开展服务的主要挑战和策略相关的问题。数据导出到 Microsoft Office Excel 和 SPSS®。采用多重线性回归分析评估回答与人口统计学信息之间的关联,显著性水平为 5%(p<0.05)。本研究得到了研究伦理委员会的批准(编号:4.295.171)。

结果

共有 625 名社区药剂师对调查做出了回应。大多数药剂师报告说,他们总是或经常执行 31 个步骤中的 17 个(54%)。药剂师报告说执行频率更高的步骤包括形成药物名称(n=569,91.04%)、根据当前法规验证处方的完整性和适宜性(n=567,90.72%)和提供剂量咨询(n=549,87.84%)。文档记录是药剂师报告说从未或很少执行的主要步骤(n=424,67.84%)。结果表明,变量公共教育机构、年龄和研究生教育对发药步骤的频率有显著影响(F(3, 621)=14.884,p<0.001;R=0.063)。

结论

本研究表明,大多数药剂师报告说,在药物配发过程中,他们总是或经常询问仪器中包含的大多数问题并提供咨询。这些结果可以帮助我们了解当前的发药实践,并为制定服务质量提升策略提供思路。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Missing data in surveys: Key concepts, approaches, and applications.调查中的缺失数据:关键概念、方法及应用
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Feb;18(2):2308-2316. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.03.009. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
7
Experiential education in the pharmacy undergraduate curricula in Brazil.巴西药学本科课程中的体验式教育。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2020 Jan-Mar;18(1):1738. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2020.1.1738. Epub 2020 Mar 15.
10
Reporting quality of survey research articles published in the pharmacy literature.药学文献中发表的调查研究文章的报告质量。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Oct;16(10):1354-1358. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.01.005. Epub 2020 Jan 20.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验