Suppr超能文献

基于穿支的螺旋桨皮瓣在上肢软组织重建中的可靠性:一项系统评价。

Perforator-based propeller flaps reliability in upper extremity soft tissue reconstruction: a systematic review.

作者信息

Vitse J, Bekara F, Bertheuil N, Sinna R, Chaput B, Herlin C

机构信息

1 Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burns and Wound Healing Units, CHRU Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France.

2 Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, CHRU Rennes, Rennes, France.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2017 Feb;42(2):157-164. doi: 10.1177/1753193416669262. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Current data on upper extremity propeller flaps are poor and do not allow the assessment of the safety of this technique. A systematic literature review was conducted searching PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library electronic databases, and the selection process was adapted from the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis statement. The final analysis included ten relevant articles involving 117 flaps. The majority of flaps were used for the hand, distal wrist, and elbow. The radial artery perforator and ulnar artery perforator were the most frequently used flaps. The were 7% flaps with venous congestion and 3% with complete necrosis. No difference in complications rate was found for different flaps sites. Perforator-based propeller flaps appear to be an interesting procedure for covering soft tissue defects involving the upper extremities, even for large defects, but the procedure requires experience and close monitoring.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

摘要

未标注

目前关于上肢推进皮瓣的资料匮乏,无法评估该技术的安全性。我们进行了一项系统的文献综述,检索了PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆电子数据库,选择过程依据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目声明进行调整。最终分析纳入了10篇相关文章,涉及117个皮瓣。大多数皮瓣用于手部、腕部远端和肘部。桡动脉穿支皮瓣和尺动脉穿支皮瓣是最常用的皮瓣。有7%的皮瓣出现静脉淤血,3%的皮瓣完全坏死。不同皮瓣部位的并发症发生率无差异。基于穿支的推进皮瓣似乎是覆盖上肢软组织缺损(即使是大的缺损)的一种有吸引力的术式,但该手术需要经验和密切监测。

证据级别

II级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验