Matsumoto Kazuya, Takeda Yohei, Onoyama Takumi, Kawata Soichiro, Kurumi Hiroki, Ueki Masaru, Miura Norimasa, Isomoto Hajime
Kazuya Matsumoto, Yohei Takeda, Takumi Onoyama, Soichiro Kawata, Hiroki Kurumi, Hajime Isomoto, Department of Gastroenterology, Tottori University Hospital, Yonago 683-8504, Japan.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Sep 15;8(9):656-62. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i9.656.
Pancreatic cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer death and has the lowest survival rate of any solid cancer. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNA) is currently capable of providing a cytopathological diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies with a higher diagnostic power, with a sensitivity and specificity of 85%-89% and 98%-99%, compared to pancreatic juice cytology (PJC), whose sensitivity and specificity are only 33.3%-93% and 83.3%-100%. However, EUS-FNA is not effective in the cases of carcinoma in situ and minimally invasive carcinoma because both are undetectable by endoscopic ultrasonography, although PJC is able to detect them. As for the frequency of complications such as post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis, EUS-FNA is safer than PJC. To diagnose pancreatic cancer appropriately, it is necessary for us to master both procedures so that we can select the best methods of sampling tissues while considering the patient's safety and condition.
胰腺癌是癌症死亡的第五大主要原因,也是所有实体癌中生存率最低的。内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS-FNA)目前能够对胰腺恶性肿瘤进行细胞病理学诊断,其诊断能力更高,与胰液细胞学检查(PJC)相比,敏感性和特异性分别为85%-89%和98%-99%,而PJC的敏感性和特异性仅为33.3%-93%和83.3%-100%。然而,EUS-FNA在原位癌和微浸润癌的情况下无效,因为这两种情况都无法通过内镜超声检测到,尽管PJC能够检测到它们。至于内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎等并发症的发生率,EUS-FNA比PJC更安全。为了准确诊断胰腺癌,我们有必要掌握这两种检查方法,以便在考虑患者的安全性和病情的同时选择最佳的组织采样方法。