• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于使用自动筛查系统进行宫颈细胞学质量控制再筛查的多机构可行性研究。

A Multi-Institutional Feasibility Study on the Use of Automated Screening Systems for Quality Control Rescreening of Cervical Cytology.

作者信息

Sugiyama Yuko, Sasaki Hiroshi, Komatsu Kyoko, Yabushita Ryuji, Oda Mizue, Yanoh Kenji, Ueda Masatsugu, Itamochi Hiroaki, Okugawa Kaoru, Fujita Hiromasa, Tase Toru, Nakatani Eiji, Moriya Takuya

机构信息

The Japanese Society of Clinical Cytology Study Group on the Use of Automated Screening Systems for Quality Control Purposes regarding Cervical Cytology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Acta Cytol. 2016;60(5):451-457. doi: 10.1159/000449499. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1159/000449499
PMID:27673689
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of the automated screening system FocalPoint for cervical cytology quality control (QC) rescreening. False-negative rates (FNRs) were evaluated by a multi-institutional retrospective study.

STUDY DESIGN

Cervical cytology slides that had already been reported as negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM) were chosen arbitrarily for FocalPoint rescreening. Slides stratified into the highest 15% probability of being abnormal were rescreened by a cytotechnologist. The slides that were abnormal were reevaluated by a cytopathologist to be false negatives.

RESULTS

Rescreening of 12,000 slides, i.e. 9,000 conventional slides and 3,000 liquid-based cytology (LBC) slides, was performed; 9,826 (7,393 conventional and 2,433 LBC) were satisfactory for FocalPoint (2,174 were determined unsatisfactory) and those within the highest 15% of probability (1,496, i.e. 1,123 conventional and 373 LBC) were rescreened. As a result, 117 (96 conventional and 21 LBC) were determined as abnormal (other than NILM) and the FNR was 1.19%. Among these 117 slides, 40 (35 conventional and 5 LBC) were determined as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and greater (HSIL+).

CONCLUSION

Of 117 (1.19%) abnormal slides detected, 40 (0.41%) were determined to be HSIL+. This result suggests that FocalPoint is effective for QC rescreening of cervical cytology.

摘要

目的

评估自动化筛查系统FocalPoint用于宫颈细胞学质量控制(QC)复查的效果。通过多机构回顾性研究评估假阴性率(FNR)。

研究设计

任意选择已报告为上皮内病变或恶性肿瘤阴性(NILM)的宫颈细胞学玻片进行FocalPoint复查。将概率最高的15%可能异常的玻片由细胞技术人员进行复查。对异常的玻片由细胞病理学家重新评估以确定为假阴性。

结果

对12,000张玻片进行了复查,即9,000张传统玻片和3,000张液基细胞学(LBC)玻片;9,826张(7,393张传统玻片和2,433张LBC玻片)FocalPoint复查结果满意(2,174张被判定为不满意),对概率最高的15%的玻片(1,496张,即1,123张传统玻片和373张LBC玻片)进行了复查。结果,117张(96张传统玻片和21张LBC玻片)被判定为异常(非NILM),FNR为1.19%。在这117张玻片中,40张(35张传统玻片和5张LBC玻片)被判定为高级别鳞状上皮内病变及更高级别(HSIL+)。

结论

在检测出的117张(1.19%)异常玻片中,40张(0.41%)被判定为HSIL+。这一结果表明FocalPoint在宫颈细胞学QC复查中是有效的。

相似文献

1
A Multi-Institutional Feasibility Study on the Use of Automated Screening Systems for Quality Control Rescreening of Cervical Cytology.一项关于使用自动筛查系统进行宫颈细胞学质量控制再筛查的多机构可行性研究。
Acta Cytol. 2016;60(5):451-457. doi: 10.1159/000449499. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
2
Introduction of liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening in Luxembourg.卢森堡宫颈癌筛查中液基细胞学和人乳头瘤病毒检测的介绍。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2017 May;45(5):384-390. doi: 10.1002/dc.23678. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
3
A feasibility study of the AutoPap system location-guided screening.自动巴氏涂片系统定位引导筛查的可行性研究。
Acta Cytol. 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):221-6. doi: 10.1159/000331550.
4
Morphologic analysis of false negative SurePath® slides using Focalpoint™ GS computer-assisted cervical screening technology: An Australian experience.使用Focalpoint™ GS计算机辅助宫颈筛查技术对SurePath®假阴性玻片进行形态学分析:澳大利亚的经验。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2015 Nov;43(11):870-8. doi: 10.1002/dc.23314. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
5
The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology. Comparing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice.用于宫颈细胞学初筛的自动巴氏涂片系统。将一项前瞻性、预期用途研究的结果与常规手工操作结果进行比较。
Acta Cytol. 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):214-20. doi: 10.1159/000331549.
6
The AutoPap 300 QC System multicenter clinical trials for use in quality control rescreening of cervical smears: II. Prospective and archival sensitivity studies.用于宫颈涂片质量控制再筛查的AutoPap 300质量控制系统多中心临床试验:II. 前瞻性和存档敏感性研究。
Cancer. 1997 Dec 25;81(6):343-7. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19971225)81:6<343::aid-cncr8>3.0.co;2-m.
7
Neural-network-assisted analysis and microscopic rescreening in presumed negative cervical cytologic smears. A comparison.神经网络辅助分析与对疑似阴性宫颈细胞学涂片进行显微镜复查:一项比较研究
Acta Cytol. 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):227-32. doi: 10.1159/000331551.
8
Rescreening in gynecologic cytology. Rescreening of 8096 previous cases for current low-grade and indeterminate-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion diagnoses--a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 323 laboratories.妇科细胞学中的重新筛查。对8096例既往病例进行重新筛查,以确定当前低级别和不确定级别的鳞状上皮内病变诊断——美国病理学家学会对323个实验室的Q-Probes研究。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996 Jun;120(6):519-22.
9
The AutoPap 300 QC System multicenter clinical trials for use in quality control rescreening of cervical smears: I. A prospective intended use study.用于宫颈涂片质量控制再筛查的AutoPap 300质量控制(QC)系统多中心临床试验:I. 一项前瞻性预期用途研究。
Cancer. 1997 Dec 25;81(6):337-42. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19971225)81:6<337::aid-cncr7>3.0.co;2-i.
10
False negative rate of cervical cytologic smear screening as determined by rapid rescreening.
Acta Cytol. 1999 May-Jun;43(3):344-50. doi: 10.1159/000331079.

引用本文的文献

1
A Deep Learning Model for Cervical Cancer Screening on Liquid-Based Cytology Specimens in Whole Slide Images.一种用于在全玻片图像中对液基细胞学标本进行宫颈癌筛查的深度学习模型。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 24;14(5):1159. doi: 10.3390/cancers14051159.
2
Comparison of ThinPrep Integrated Imager-Assisted Screening versus Manual Screening of ThinPrep Liquid-Based Cytology Specimens.ThinPrep集成成像仪辅助筛查与ThinPrep液基细胞学标本手工筛查的比较。
Acta Cytol. 2020;64(5):486-491. doi: 10.1159/000507910. Epub 2020 Jun 12.