Suppr超能文献

终末期酒精性肝硬化患者长期随访中的死亡率预测因素:是时候接受重新修订的评分了吗?

Predictors of Mortality in Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients with Terminal Alcoholic Cirrhosis: Is It Time to Accept Remodeled Scores?

作者信息

Radisavljevic Mirjana M, Bjelakovic Goran B, Nagorni Aleksandar V, Stojanovic Miroslav P, Radojkovicn Milan D, Jovic Jasna Z, Ignjatovic Aleksandra M, Radisavljevic Misa M, Simonovic Maja M

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Clinical Center of Nis, Nis, Serbia.

出版信息

Med Princ Pract. 2017;26(2):169-175. doi: 10.1159/000451057. Epub 2016 Sep 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify the prognostic score that is the best predictor of outcome in patients hospitalized with decompensated liver cirrhosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this prospective study, 126 patients were enrolled and followed up for 29 months. For each patient, prognostic scores were calculated; these included the Child-Turcotte-Pugh score (CTP score), CTP creatinine-modified I score, CTP creatinine-modified II score, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD score), MELD model for end-stage liver disease sodium-modified score, Integrated MELD score, updated MELD score, United Kingdom MELD, and the MELD score remodeled by serum sodium index (MESO index). Cox regression analysis was used to assess the ability of each of the scores for predicting mortality in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. Their discriminatory ability was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

The updated MELD score had the highest predictive value (3.29) among the tested scores (95% CI: 2.26-4.78). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the MELD score of 22.50 (AUC = 0.914, 95% CI: 0.849-0.978; p < 0.001) had the best discriminative ability for identifying patients with a high risk of mortality; the next best was the MESO index of 16.00 (AUC = 0.912, 95% CI: 0.847-0.978; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The risk of mortality was highest in patients with the highest updated MELD score, and those with MELD scores >22.50 and a MESO index >16.00.

摘要

目的

确定能最佳预测失代偿期肝硬化住院患者预后的预后评分。

材料与方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,纳入了126例患者并随访29个月。为每位患者计算预后评分;这些评分包括Child-Turcotte-Pugh评分(CTP评分)、CTP肌酐修正I评分、CTP肌酐修正II评分、终末期肝病模型(MELD评分)、终末期肝病模型钠修正评分、综合MELD评分、更新的MELD评分、英国MELD评分以及血清钠指数重塑的MELD评分(MESO指数)。采用Cox回归分析评估各评分预测酒精性肝硬化患者死亡率的能力。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估其鉴别能力。

结果

在测试的评分中,更新的MELD评分具有最高的预测价值(3.29)(95%可信区间:2.26 - 4.78)。ROC曲线分析表明,MELD评分为22.50(AUC = 0.914,95%可信区间:0.849 - 0.978;p < 0.001)对识别高死亡风险患者具有最佳鉴别能力;其次是MESO指数为16.00(AUC = 0.912,95%可信区间:0.847 - 0.978;p < 0.001)。

结论

更新的MELD评分最高的患者以及MELD评分>22.50且MESO指数>16.00的患者死亡风险最高。

相似文献

2
Validation of model for end-stage liver disease score to serum sodium ratio index as a prognostic predictor in patients with cirrhosis.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Sep;24(9):1547-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05913.x. Epub 2009 Aug 3.
4
A revised scope in different prognostic models in cirrhotic patients: Current and future perspectives, an Egyptian experience.
Arab J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec;14(4):158-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajg.2013.08.007. Epub 2013 Sep 29.
5
[Prognostic value of the model for end-stage liver disease combined with serum sodium levels in patients with decompensated cirrhosis].
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2012 Dec;20(12):896-901. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2012.12.005.

引用本文的文献

3
Predictive Factors for the Prognosis of Alcoholic Liver Cirrhosis.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 16;58(12):1859. doi: 10.3390/medicina58121859.
4
Predicting mortality among patients with liver cirrhosis in electronic health records with machine learning.
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 31;16(8):e0256428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256428. eCollection 2021.
5
Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis in alcoholic liver disease.
Clin Exp Hepatol. 2020 Jun;6(2):125-130. doi: 10.5114/ceh.2020.95739. Epub 2020 May 27.
6
Scoring systems for prediction of mortality in decompensated liver cirrhosis: A meta-analysis of test accuracy.
World J Clin Cases. 2018 Dec 6;6(15):995-1006. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i15.995.

本文引用的文献

2
Hyponatraemia and cirrhosis.
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2014 Feb;2(1):21-6. doi: 10.1093/gastro/got037. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
3
Characteristics of alcoholic liver disease and predictive factors for mortality of patients with alcoholic cirrhosis.
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2013 Dec;12(6):594-601. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(13)60094-6.
5
Severe hyponatremia is a better predictor of mortality than MELDNa in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites.
J Hepatol. 2012 Aug;57(2):274-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.03.018. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
6
Clinical course of alcoholic liver cirrhosis: a Danish population-based cohort study.
Hepatology. 2010 May;51(5):1675-82. doi: 10.1002/hep.23500.
7
Alcoholic liver disease.
Hepatology. 2010 Jan;51(1):307-28. doi: 10.1002/hep.23258.
8
Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarker research.
J Clin Pathol. 2009 Jan;62(1):1-5. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2008.061010. Epub 2008 Sep 25.
9
Hyponatremia and mortality among patients on the liver-transplant waiting list.
N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 4;359(10):1018-26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0801209.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验