Sun Enid Y, Jadotte Yuri T, Halperin William
Internal Medicine Resident Physician (Dr Sun), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; New Jersey Medical School (Dr Halperin), School of Public Health, Newark Campus (Dr Halperin), and School of Nursing, Newark Campus (Dr Jadotte); Northeast Institute for Evidence Synthesis and Translation, School of Nursing (Dr Jadotte), Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey; Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine (Dr Jadotte), Stony Brook University; Stony Brook, New York.
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2017 Jan;37(1):2-10. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000203.
Phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a class I recommendation for all patients following an acute cardiac event or cardiac surgery according to the The American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Studies have shown that there are differences in cardiac rehabilitation participation rates between sociodemographic groups. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analyses was to synthesize quantitative data on the relationship between outpatient cardiac rehabilitation (OCR) attendance and various sociodemographic factors.
We conducted a search of PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Dissertations & Theses A&I, and conference abstracts for observational studies conducted in the United States that fit our inclusion criteria. A total of 21 studies were included in our final review and meta-analyses.
Our meta-analyses showed that overall, attenders were younger than nonattenders (mean difference=-3.74 years, 95% CI =-5.87 to -1.61) and the odds of participation were lower among females (OR = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.51-0.69), individuals with a high school degree or less (OR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.50-0.91), and the uninsured or self-payers (OR = 0.32; 95% CI = 0.14-0.71). Full- or part-time employees were more likely to participate than those not employed (OR = 1.45; 95% CI = 1.08-1.95).
Our systematic review and meta-analyses showed that there are significant sociodemographic disparities in CR participation. On the basis of this knowledge, clinicians and policy makers should focus on identifying and eliminating barriers to participation.
根据美国心脏协会和美国心脏病学会基金会的建议,二期心脏康复(CR)是所有急性心脏事件或心脏手术后患者的I类推荐。研究表明,社会人口统计学群体之间的心脏康复参与率存在差异。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是综合关于门诊心脏康复(OCR)出勤率与各种社会人口统计学因素之间关系的定量数据。
我们在PubMed、PsycINFO、CINAHL、谷歌学术、学位论文数据库和会议摘要中搜索了在美国进行的符合我们纳入标准的观察性研究。共有21项研究纳入了我们的最终评价和荟萃分析。
我们的荟萃分析表明,总体而言,参与者比非参与者年轻(平均差异=-3.74岁,95%CI=-5.87至-1.61),女性参与的几率较低(OR=0.59;95%CI=0.51-0.69),高中及以下学历者(OR=0.67;95%CI=0.50-0.91),以及未参保者或自费者(OR=0.32;95%CI=0.14-0.71)。全职或兼职员工比未就业者更有可能参与(OR=1.45;95%CI=1.08-1.95)。
我们的系统评价和荟萃分析表明,心脏康复参与存在显著的社会人口统计学差异。基于这些认识,临床医生和政策制定者应专注于识别和消除参与障碍。