Suppr超能文献

遗传毒性专家小组审查:草甘膦、草甘膦基制剂和氨甲基膦酸遗传毒性的证据权重评估

Genotoxicity Expert Panel review: weight of evidence evaluation of the genotoxicity of glyphosate, glyphosate-based formulations, and aminomethylphosphonic acid.

作者信息

Brusick David, Aardema Marilyn, Kier Larry, Kirkland David, Williams Gary

机构信息

a Toxicology Consultant , Bumpass , VA , USA.

b Marilyn Aardema Consulting, LLC , Fairfield , OH , USA.

出版信息

Crit Rev Toxicol. 2016 Sep;46(sup1):56-74. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2016.1214680.

Abstract

In 2015, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) published a monograph concluding there was strong evidence for genotoxicity of glyphosate and glyphosate formulations and moderate evidence for genotoxicity of the metabolite aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA). These conclusions contradicted earlier extensive reviews supporting the lack of genotoxicity of glyphosate and glyphosate formulations. The IARC Monograph concluded there was strong evidence of induction of oxidative stress by glyphosate, glyphosate formulations, and AMPA. The Expert Panel reviewed the genotoxicity and oxidative stress data considered in the IARC Monograph, together with other available data not considered by IARC. The Expert Panel defined and used a weight of evidence (WoE) approach that included ranking of studies and endpoints by the strength of their linkage to events associated with carcinogenic mechanisms. Importantly, the Expert Panel concluded that there was sufficient information available from a very large number of regulatory genotoxicity studies that should have been considered by IARC. The WoE approach, the inclusion of all relevant regulatory studies, and some differences in interpretation of individual studies led to significantly different conclusions by the Expert Panel compared with the IARC Monograph. The Expert Panel concluded that glyphosate, glyphosate formulations, and AMPA do not pose a genotoxic hazard and the data do not support the IARC Monograph genotoxicity evaluation. With respect to carcinogenicity classification and mechanism, the Expert Panel concluded that evidence relating to an oxidative stress mechanism of carcinogenicity was largely unconvincing and that the data profiles were not consistent with the characteristics of genotoxic carcinogens.

摘要

2015年,国际癌症研究机构(IARC)发表了一份专题论文,得出结论称,有强有力的证据表明草甘膦及其制剂具有遗传毒性,而对于代谢物氨甲基膦酸(AMPA)的遗传毒性则有中等强度的证据。这些结论与早期支持草甘膦及其制剂无遗传毒性的广泛综述相矛盾。IARC专题论文得出结论,有强有力的证据表明草甘膦、其制剂以及AMPA可诱导氧化应激。专家小组审查了IARC专题论文中所考虑的遗传毒性和氧化应激数据,以及IARC未考虑的其他现有数据。专家小组界定并采用了证据权重(WoE)方法,其中包括根据研究和终点与致癌机制相关事件的联系强度进行排名。重要的是,专家小组得出结论,IARC本应考虑大量监管遗传毒性研究中所提供的充分信息。证据权重方法、纳入所有相关监管研究以及对个别研究解释上的一些差异,导致专家小组得出与IARC专题论文显著不同的结论。专家小组得出结论,草甘膦、其制剂以及AMPA不构成遗传毒性危害,且数据不支持IARC专题论文的遗传毒性评估。关于致癌性分类和机制,专家小组得出结论,与致癌性氧化应激机制相关的证据在很大程度上缺乏说服力,且数据概况与遗传毒性致癌物的特征不一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验