Division of Translational Toxicology, NIEHS, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Integrated Laboratory Systems, LLC (an Inotiv company), Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2023 Apr;64(4):202-233. doi: 10.1002/em.22534. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
Glyphosate, the most heavily used herbicide world-wide, is applied to plants in complex formulations that promote absorption. The National Toxicology Program reported in 1992 that glyphosate, administered to rats and mice at doses up to 50,000 ppm in feed for 13 weeks, showed little evidence of toxicity, and no induction of micronuclei was observed in the mice in this study. Subsequently, mechanistic studies of glyphosate and glyphosate-based formulations (GBFs) that have focused on DNA damage and oxidative stress suggest that glyphosate may have genotoxic potential. However, few of these studies directly compared glyphosate to GBFs, or effects among GBFs. To address these data gaps, we tested glyphosate, glyphosate isopropylamine (IPA), and (aminomethyl)phosphonic acid (AMPA, a microbial metabolite of glyphosate), 9 high-use agricultural GBFs, 4 residential-use GBFs, and additional herbicides (metolachlor, mesotrione, and diquat dibromide) present in some of the GBFs in bacterial mutagenicity tests, and in human TK6 cells using a micronucleus assay and a multiplexed DNA damage assay. Our results showed no genotoxicity or notable cytotoxicity for glyphosate or AMPA at concentrations up to 10 mM, while all GBFs and herbicides other than glyphosate were cytotoxic, and some showed genotoxic activity. An in vitro to in vivo extrapolation of results for glyphosate suggests that it is of low toxicological concern for humans. In conclusion, these results demonstrate a lack of genotoxicity for glyphosate, consistent with observations in the NTP in vivo study, and suggest that toxicity associated with GBFs may be related to other components of these formulations.
草甘膦是世界上使用最广泛的除草剂,它以促进吸收的复杂配方应用于植物。1992 年,国家毒理学计划报告称,草甘膦以高达 50000ppm 的剂量添加到饲料中,连续给老鼠喂食 13 周,几乎没有显示出毒性,而且在这项研究中,老鼠也没有观察到微核的诱导。随后,对草甘膦和草甘膦基制剂(GBF)的机制研究集中在 DNA 损伤和氧化应激上,表明草甘膦可能具有遗传毒性潜力。然而,这些研究很少直接将草甘膦与 GBF 进行比较,或者比较 GBF 之间的影响。为了解决这些数据空白,我们在细菌致突变性测试中测试了草甘膦、草甘膦异丙胺(IPA)和(氨甲基)膦酸(AMPA,草甘膦的微生物代谢物)、9 种高用量农业 GBF、4 种住宅用 GBF 以及一些 GBF 中存在的其他除草剂(甲草胺、麦草畏和二溴化二癸基铵),以及在人类 TK6 细胞中使用微核试验和多重 DNA 损伤试验。我们的结果表明,在高达 10mM 的浓度下,草甘膦或 AMPA 没有遗传毒性或明显的细胞毒性,而所有 GBF 和除草甘膦以外的除草剂都具有细胞毒性,有些还表现出遗传毒性活性。草甘膦体外到体内的外推结果表明,它对人类的毒性较低。总之,这些结果表明草甘膦没有遗传毒性,与 NTP 体内研究的观察结果一致,并表明与 GBF 相关的毒性可能与这些制剂的其他成分有关。