FEFD-Faculdade de Educação Física e Dança, Universidade Federal de Goiás-UFG, Campus Samambaia, Avenida Esperança s/n, CEP: 74.690-900, Goiânia, Goiás, Brasil.
School of Sport, Health, and Social Sciences, Southampton Solent University, Southampton, UK.
Sports Med. 2017 May;47(5):843-855. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0627-5.
Resistance exercises can be considered to be multi-joint (MJ) or single-joint (SJ) in nature. Many strength coaches, trainers, and trainees believe that adding SJ exercises to a resistance training (RT) program may be required to optimize muscular size and strength. However, given that lack of time is a frequently cited barrier to exercise adoption, the time commitment resulting from these recommendations may not be convenient for many people. Therefore, it is important to find strategies that reduce the time commitment without negatively affecting results. The aim of this review was to analyze and discuss the present body of literature considering the acute responses to and long-term adaptations resulting from SJ and MJ exercise selection. Studies were deemed eligible for inclusion if they were experimental studies comparing the effects of MJ, SJ, or MJ + SJ on dependent variables; studies were excluded if they were reviews or abstracts only, if they involved clinical populations or persons with articular or musculoskeletal problems, or if the RT intervention was confounded by other factors. Taking these factors into account, a total of 23 studies were included. For the upper and lower limbs, analysis of surface electromyographic (sEMG) activation suggests that there are no differences between SJ and MJ exercises when comparing the prime movers. However, evidence is contrasting when considering the trunk extensor musculature. Only one study directly compared the effects of MJ and SJ on muscle recovery and the results suggest that SJ exercises resulted in increased muscle fatigue and soreness. Long-term studies comparing increases in muscle size and strength in the upper limbs reported no difference between SJ and MJ exercises and no additional effects when SJ exercises were included in an MJ exercise program. For the lumbar extensors, the studies reviewed tend to support the view that this muscle group may benefit from SJ exercise. People performing RT may not need to include SJ exercises in their program to obtain equivalent results in terms of muscle activation and long-term adaptations such as hypertrophy and strength. SJ exercises may only be necessary to strengthen lumbar extensors and to correct muscular imbalances.
抗阻训练可以被认为是多关节(MJ)或单关节(SJ)的。许多力量教练、培训师和学员认为,在抗阻训练(RT)计划中加入 SJ 运动可能是优化肌肉大小和力量所必需的。然而,由于缺乏时间是经常被引用的运动采用障碍,这些建议所带来的时间投入对于许多人来说可能并不方便。因此,找到一种可以在不影响结果的情况下减少时间投入的策略是很重要的。本综述的目的是分析和讨论目前关于 SJ 和 MJ 运动选择的急性反应和长期适应的文献。如果研究是比较 MJ、SJ 或 MJ+SJ 对因变量影响的实验研究,则被认为符合纳入标准;如果研究仅为综述或摘要、涉及临床人群或有关节或肌肉骨骼问题的人群、或 RT 干预受到其他因素的混淆,则被排除在外。考虑到这些因素,共有 23 项研究被纳入。对于上下肢,表面肌电图(sEMG)激活分析表明,在比较原动肌时,SJ 和 MJ 运动之间没有差异。然而,当考虑到躯干伸肌肌群时,证据则相互矛盾。只有一项研究直接比较了 MJ 和 SJ 对肌肉恢复的影响,结果表明 SJ 运动导致肌肉疲劳和酸痛增加。比较上肢肌肉大小和力量长期增加的研究报告称,SJ 和 MJ 运动之间没有差异,并且当 SJ 运动被纳入 MJ 运动计划中时,没有额外的效果。对于腰椎伸肌,综述中的研究倾向于支持这样一种观点,即该肌肉群可能受益于 SJ 运动。进行 RT 的人可能不需要在他们的计划中加入 SJ 运动,就可以获得在肌肉激活和长期适应(如肥大和力量)方面的等效结果。SJ 运动可能只需要加强腰椎伸肌并纠正肌肉不平衡。