Strength Training Study and Research Group, Paulista University, UNIP, São Paulo, SP-Brazil.
School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP-Brazil.
J Strength Cond Res. 2020 May;34(5):1254-1263. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003550.
Brandão, L, de Salles Painelli, V, Lasevicius, T, Silva-Batista, C, Brendon, H, Schoenfeld, BJ, Aihara, AY, Cardoso, FN, de Almeida Peres, B, and Teixeira, EL. Varying the order of combinations of single- and multi-joint exercises differentially affects resistance training adaptations. J Strength Cond Res 34(5): 1254-1263, 2020-Our study aimed to compare the effects of multi-joint (MJ) and single-joint (SJ) exercises, either isolated or in combination, and in different orders, on cross-sectional area (CSA) of the pectoralis major (PM) and different heads of the triceps brachii (TB), as well as on the one-repetition maximum (1-RM) in the bench press and lying barbell triceps press. Forty-three young men were randomly assigned to one of 4 possible RT protocols: barbell bench press plus lying barbell triceps press (MJ + SJ, n = 12); lying barbell triceps press plus barbell bench press (SJ + MJ, n = 10); barbell bench press (MJ, n = 10); or lying barbell triceps press (SJ, n = 11). Results showed significant within-group increases in 1-RM bench press for MJ, MJ + SJ, and SJ + MJ but not for SJ. Conversely, significantly greater within-group increases in elbow extension 1-RM were noted for SJ, MJ + SJ, and SJ + MJ but not for MJ. Significantly greater increases in PM CSA were observed for MJ, MJ + SJ, and SJ + MJ compared with SJ. Significant increases in TB CSA were noted for SJ, MJ + SJ, and SJ + MJ, but not for MJ, without observed between-group differences. Individual analysis of TB heads showed significantly greater CSA increases in the lateral head for MJ, MJ + SJ, and SJ + MJ compared with SJ. Alternatively, significantly greater increases in the long head were observed for SJ, MJ + SJ, and SJ + MJ compared with MJ. CSA increases for the medial head were statistically similar between conditions. Our findings indicate that muscular adaptations are differentially affected by performance of MJ and SJ exercises.
布兰道、L、德萨列斯·佩内利、V、拉塞维奇、T、席尔瓦-巴蒂斯塔、C、布伦登、H、舍恩菲尔德、BJ、相原、AY、卡多佐、FN、德阿尔梅达·佩雷斯、B 和特谢拉、EL。不同顺序的单关节和多关节练习组合对阻力训练适应性的影响不同。J 力量与条件研究 34(5):1254-1263,2020-我们的研究旨在比较多关节(MJ)和单关节(SJ)练习,无论是单独进行还是组合进行,以及以不同的顺序进行,对胸大肌(PM)和肱三头肌不同头的横截面积(CSA)的影响,以及对卧推和仰卧杠铃三头肌按压的 1 重复最大值(1-RM)的影响。43 名年轻男性被随机分配到 4 种可能的 RT 方案之一:杠铃卧推加仰卧杠铃三头肌按压(MJ+SJ,n=12);仰卧杠铃三头肌按压加杠铃卧推(SJ+MJ,n=10);杠铃卧推(MJ,n=10);或仰卧杠铃三头肌按压(SJ,n=11)。结果显示,MJ、MJ+SJ 和 SJ+MJ 组的卧推 1-RM 有显著的组内增加,但 SJ 组没有。相反,SJ、MJ+SJ 和 SJ+MJ 组的肘部伸展 1-RM 有显著的组内增加,但 MJ 组没有。PM CSA 的增加在 MJ、MJ+SJ 和 SJ+MJ 组中观察到显著高于 SJ 组。SJ、MJ+SJ 和 SJ+MJ 组的 TB CSA 增加显著,但 MJ 组没有,组间没有差异。TB 头部的个体分析显示,与 SJ 相比,MJ、MJ+SJ 和 SJ+MJ 组的外侧头部 CSA 增加显著。相反,SJ、MJ+SJ 和 SJ+MJ 组的长头 CSA 增加显著高于 MJ 组。内侧头的 CSA 增加在不同条件下统计学上相似。我们的研究结果表明,肌肉适应性受到进行单关节和多关节练习的影响而有所不同。