Schacht Ryan, Tharp Douglas, Smith Ken R
Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Department of Family and Consumer Studies, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Hum Nat. 2016 Dec;27(4):489-500. doi: 10.1007/s12110-016-9271-x.
The negative social outcomes in populations with male-biased sex ratios are a growing concern. In general, the expectation is of heightened violence as a result of excess men engaging in antisocial behavior and crime, thereby threatening societal stability. While intuitive, these claims are largely unsupported in the literature. Using mating market theory as our guide, we examine indicators of male mating effort, including (1) violent competition between men (homicide, aggravated assault) and (2) indicators of uncommitted sexual behavior (rape, sex offenses, and prostitution). Our unit of analysis is U.S. county-level data. We find that counties with more men have lower rates of crime and violent behavior. Our findings challenge conventional claims of male excess leading to elevated levels of violence. Instead, in support of mating market predictions, we find that criminal and violent behavior related to male mating effort is least common in male-biased sex ratios. We discuss the implications of our findings for public policy regarding incarceration and criminal behavior.
男性比例偏高人群中的负面社会后果日益受到关注。一般来说,人们预计由于过多男性从事反社会行为和犯罪,暴力行为会加剧,从而威胁社会稳定。虽然这些说法直观,但在文献中大多没有依据。以婚姻市场理论为指导,我们研究了男性求偶努力的指标,包括(1)男性之间的暴力竞争(杀人、严重攻击)和(2)非承诺性行为的指标(强奸、性犯罪和卖淫)。我们的分析单位是美国县级数据。我们发现男性较多的县犯罪率和暴力行为发生率较低。我们的研究结果挑战了男性过多导致暴力水平上升的传统说法。相反,为支持婚姻市场预测,我们发现与男性求偶努力相关的犯罪和暴力行为在男性比例偏高的情况下最不常见。我们讨论了研究结果对有关监禁和犯罪行为的公共政策的影响。