Suppr超能文献

不同报废液晶显示器管理策略的环境影响评估

Environmental impact assessment of different end-of-life LCD management strategies.

作者信息

Amato Alessia, Rocchetti Laura, Beolchini Francesca

机构信息

Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.

Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2017 Jan;59:432-441. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.024. Epub 2016 Sep 24.

Abstract

The strong growth of the electrical and electronic equipment production combined with its short lifespan are causing the production of a significant amount of waste to treat. In particular, the present paper focuses on end-of-life liquid crystal displays (LCDs) for their significant content of valuable materials, like plastic, glass and metals that could be recovered after dismantling. In the recent literature, traditional LCD recycling processes are combined with innovative treatments, which allow to recover critical raw materials, such as indium. In this context, we have evaluated the environmental impact of four different strategies of end-of-life LCD management: the disposal in landfilling sites, the incineration, the traditional recycling treatment and an innovative process also addressed to the recovery of indium. The traditional recycling treatment resulted to be the best scenario for the environment. Indeed, a life cycle assessment study gave following environmental burdens (if negative they are credits): 18, 81, -68, -60kg CO-equiv. and 0.08, 0.01, -0.25, -0.18mol H-equiv., for the four scenarios in the categories of global warming and acidification, respectively. The limit of the variability of LCD composition was overcome including additional literature data in the study. In order to improve the innovative process sustainability, a system of water recirculation was optimized with a consequent impact decrease of 35% in the global warming category. Nevertheless, this action should be combined with an increase of indium concentration in the panel because the low metal content represents the bottleneck of the overall approach. In this regard, a sensitivity analysis showed that an increase of at least five times in indium concentration in the waste is needed to observe an advantage of the innovative vs the traditional recycling process, when the impact category of climate change is considered. As a whole, the life cycle assessment was confirmed as a key tool for the choice of the best option of WEEE management.

摘要

电气和电子设备生产的强劲增长及其较短的使用寿命导致产生了大量需要处理的废物。特别是,本文重点关注报废液晶显示器(LCD),因为其含有大量可在拆解后回收的有价值材料,如塑料、玻璃和金属。在最近的文献中,传统的LCD回收工艺与创新处理方法相结合,从而能够回收关键原材料,如铟。在此背景下,我们评估了四种不同的报废LCD管理策略对环境的影响:填埋处置、焚烧、传统回收处理以及一种旨在回收铟的创新工艺。传统回收处理被证明是对环境最有利的方案。实际上,一项生命周期评估研究得出了以下环境负担(若为负则为环境效益):在全球变暖类别中,四种方案分别为18、81、-68、-60千克二氧化碳当量;在酸化类别中,分别为0.08、0.01、-0.25、-0.18摩尔氢离子当量。通过在研究中纳入更多文献数据,克服了LCD成分变异性的限制。为了提高创新工艺的可持续性,优化了水再循环系统,从而使全球变暖类别中的影响降低了35%。然而,这一行动应与提高面板中的铟浓度相结合,因为低金属含量是整个方法的瓶颈。在这方面,一项敏感性分析表明,当考虑气候变化影响类别时,为了使创新回收工艺相对于传统回收工艺具有优势,废物中的铟浓度至少需要提高五倍。总体而言,生命周期评估被确认为选择最佳WEEE管理方案的关键工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验