Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England.
Division of Psychology and Language Science, University College London, London, England.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Nov 1;73(11):1173-1179. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2427.
Cannabis use after first-episode psychosis is associated with poor outcomes, but the causal nature of this association is unclear.
To examine the precise nature of the association between continued cannabis use after the onset of psychosis and risk of relapse of psychosis.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective cohort study followed up for at least 2 years after the onset of psychosis 220 patients who presented to psychiatric services in South London, England, from April 12, 2002, to July 26, 2013, with first-episode psychosis. Longitudinal modeling (fixed-effects analysis, cross-lagged path analysis) was used to examine whether the association between changes in cannabis use and risk of relapse over time is the result of shared vulnerability between psychosis and cannabis use, psychosis increasing the risk of cannabis use (reverse causation), or a causal effect of cannabis use on psychosis relapse.
Exposure to cannabis within the first and second years after onset of psychosis.
The main outcome measure was relapse of psychosis, defined as subsequent hospitalization for psychosis. Effect of cannabis use status in the first year (Ct1) and second year (Ct2) and pattern of cannabis use continuation in the first year and second year were modeled for risk of relapse in the first year (Rt1) and risk of relapse in the second year (Rt2) after psychosis onset.
A total of 220 patients with first-episode psychosis were included in the analysis (mean [SD] age, 28.62 [8.58] years; age range, 18-65 years; 90 women [40.9%] and 130 men [59.1%]). Fixed-effects models that adjusted for time-variant (other illicit drug use, antipsychotic medication adherence) and time-invariant (eg, genetic or premorbid environment) unobserved confounders revealed that there was an increase in the odds of experiencing a relapse of psychosis during periods of cannabis use relative to periods of no use (odds ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.03-1.24). Change in the pattern of continuation significantly increased the risk (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13), suggesting a dose-dependent association. Cross-lagged analysis confirmed that this association reflected an effect of cannabis use on subsequent risk of relapse (Ct1→Rt2: β = 0.44, P = .04) rather than an effect of relapse on subsequent cannabis use (Rt1→Ct2: β = -0.29, P = .59).
These results reveal a dose-dependent association between change in cannabis use and relapse of psychosis that is unlikely to be a result of self-medication or genetic and environmental confounding.
首次精神病发作后使用大麻与不良结局相关,但这种关联的因果性质尚不清楚。
研究精神病发作后持续使用大麻与精神病复发风险之间的确切关联的本质。
设计、地点和参与者:这项前瞻性队列研究在 2002 年 4 月 12 日至 2013 年 7 月 26 日期间,对来自英国伦敦南部精神病服务机构的首次精神病发作的 220 名患者进行了至少 2 年的随访。纵向建模(固定效应分析,交叉滞后路径分析)用于检查大麻使用变化与随时间推移的精神病复发风险之间的关联是否是精神病和大麻使用之间共同脆弱性的结果,精神病增加大麻使用的风险(反向因果关系),还是大麻使用对精神病复发的因果影响。
在精神病发作后的第一和第二年接触大麻。
主要结局指标是精神病复发,定义为随后因精神病住院。对精神病发作后第一年(Ct1)和第二年(Ct2)的大麻使用状况以及第一年和第二年大麻使用持续模式进行建模,以预测第一年(Rt1)和第二年(Rt2)的精神病复发风险。
共纳入 220 名首发精神病患者进行分析(平均[标准差]年龄,28.62[8.58]岁;年龄范围,18-65 岁;90 名女性[40.9%]和 130 名男性[59.1%])。固定效应模型调整了随时间变化的(其他非法药物使用、抗精神病药物依从性)和随时间不变的(例如遗传或发病前环境)未观察到的混杂因素,结果显示,与不使用大麻相比,使用大麻期间精神病复发的几率增加(优势比,1.13;95%置信区间,1.03-1.24)。使用模式的变化显著增加了风险(优势比,1.07;95%置信区间,1.02-1.13),表明存在剂量依赖性关联。交叉滞后分析证实,这种关联反映了大麻使用对随后复发风险的影响(Ct1→Rt2:β=0.44,P=0.04),而不是复发对随后大麻使用的影响(Rt1→Ct2:β=-0.29,P=0.59)。
这些结果揭示了大麻使用变化与精神病复发之间存在剂量依赖性关联,这种关联不太可能是自我治疗或遗传和环境混杂的结果。