Le Bec P-Y, Fatséas M, Denis C, Lavie E, Auriacombe M
Laboratoire de psychiatrie, EA4139, faculté de médecine Victor-Pachon, institut fédératif de recherche en santé publique, Inserm-IFR no 99, université Victor-Segalen Bordeaux-2, Bordeaux, France.
Encephale. 2009 Sep;35(4):377-85. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.02.012. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
Although cannabis use may be involved in the aetiology of acute psychosis, there has been considerable debate about the association observed between cannabis use and chronic psychosis. In particular, because of the frequent co-occurrence between schizophrenia and cannabis use, the question has been raised of a causal link between exposure to cannabis as a risk factor and the development of psychosis or psychotic symptoms.
The aim of this article was to examine the evidence that cannabis use causes chronic psychotic disorders by using established criteria of causality. These criteria were defined by: biologic plausibility, strength of the interaction between the risk factor and the disease, reprieability of the results, temporal sequence between the exposure to the risk factor and the beginning of the disease and existence of a dose-effect relationship.
The selected studies were found in Medline using the keywords "cannabis" and "psychosis", "cannabis" and "schizophrenia", "cannabis" and "psychotic symptoms" and "prospective" or "cohort" or "longitudinal". The selected studies were all prospective studies assessing the temporal sequence between cannabis use and emergence of psychosis or psychotic symptoms. The search strategies resulted in 60 records that were screened by reading both titles and abstracts. Seventeen studies were considered eligible, and then, after reading the full text, seven met the inclusion criteria.
Together, the seven studies were all prospective cohorts and represented 50,275 human subjects. There were three European studies (from Sweden, Holland and Germany), one from New Zealand and one from Australia. Only one study of the seven did not show a significant association between cannabis consumption and increase of the risk of developing a psychosis. However, this study had some bias, such as low level of cannabis use and the lack of evaluation of cannabis use after inclusion. For the six other studies, data show the existence of a significant association between cannabis use and psychotic disorders (with an increased risk between 1.2 and 2.8 in Zammit et al.'s study), particularly among vulnerable individuals (that is with a prepsychotic state at the time of inclusion). Therefore, all the studies that assessed a dose-effect relationship showed this link between cannabis use and the emergence of psychosis or psychotic symptoms. The fact that all causal criteria were present in the studies suggests that cannabis use may be an independent risk factor for the development of psychosis. Results seem to be more consistent for vulnerable individuals with the hypothesis that cannabis use may precipitate psychosis, notably among vulnerable subjects. In particular, early onset of cannabis use during adolescence should be an environmental stressor that interacts with a genetic predisposition to induce a psychotic disorder.
The objective of this article was to examine whether cannabis use can be an independent risk factor for chronic psychotic disorders, by using established criteria of causality. Data extracted from the selected studies showed that cannabis use may be an independent risk factor for the development of psychotic disorders. Early screening of the vulnerability to psychotic disorder should permit improved focus on prevention and information about the specific risks related to cannabis use among this population.
尽管大麻使用可能与急性精神病的病因有关,但大麻使用与慢性精神病之间观察到的关联一直存在相当大的争议。特别是,由于精神分裂症和大麻使用经常同时出现,因此有人提出,接触大麻作为风险因素与精神病或精神病症状的发展之间是否存在因果关系。
本文旨在通过使用既定的因果标准来检验大麻使用导致慢性精神病性障碍的证据。这些标准由以下因素定义:生物学合理性、风险因素与疾病之间相互作用的强度、结果的可重复性、接触风险因素与疾病开始之间的时间顺序以及剂量效应关系的存在。
在Medline中使用关键词“大麻”和“精神病”、“大麻”和“精神分裂症”、“大麻”和“精神病症状”以及“前瞻性”或“队列”或“纵向”来查找选定的研究。选定的研究均为前瞻性研究,评估大麻使用与精神病或精神病症状出现之间的时间顺序。搜索策略产生了60条记录,通过阅读标题和摘要进行筛选。17项研究被认为合格,然后在阅读全文后,7项符合纳入标准。
这7项研究总共都是前瞻性队列研究,代表了50275名人类受试者。有3项欧洲研究(来自瑞典、荷兰和德国),1项来自新西兰,1项来自澳大利亚。这7项研究中只有1项未显示大麻消费与患精神病风险增加之间存在显著关联。然而,这项研究存在一些偏差,例如大麻使用水平较低以及纳入后未对大麻使用进行评估。对于其他6项研究,数据显示大麻使用与精神病性障碍之间存在显著关联(在Zammit等人的研究中风险增加1.2至2.8倍),特别是在易患个体中(即纳入时处于精神病前期状态)。因此,所有评估剂量效应关系的研究都表明了大麻使用与精神病或精神病症状出现之间的这种联系。研究中所有因果标准都存在这一事实表明,大麻使用可能是精神病发展的独立风险因素。对于易患个体,结果似乎更一致地支持大麻使用可能促使精神病发作的假设,特别是在易患受试者中。特别是,青少年时期早期开始使用大麻应该是一种环境应激源,它与遗传易感性相互作用以诱发精神病性障碍。
本文的目的是通过使用既定的因果标准来检验大麻使用是否可能是慢性精神病性障碍的独立风险因素。从选定研究中提取的数据表明,大麻使用可能是精神病性障碍发展的独立风险因素。对精神病性障碍易感性的早期筛查应有助于更好地关注预防,并提供有关该人群中与大麻使用相关的特定风险的信息。