Suppr超能文献

右心室间隔起搏与左心室功能保留的房室传导阻滞起搏患者新发心房颤动的发生情况

Pacing From the Right Ventricular Septum and Development of New Atrial Fibrillation in Paced Patients With Atrioventricular Block and Preserved Left Ventricular Function.

作者信息

Hayashi Katsuhide, Kohno Ritsuko, Fujino Yoshihisa, Takahashi Masao, Oginosawa Yasushi, Ohe Hisaharu, Miyamoto Tetsu, Fukuda Shota, Araki Masaru, Sonoda Shinjo, Otsuji Yutaka, Abe Haruhiko

机构信息

The Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health.

出版信息

Circ J. 2016 Oct 25;80(11):2302-2309. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0640. Epub 2016 Sep 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whether pacing from the right ventricular (RV) septum improves prognosis is unclear. Furthermore, the clinical characteristics of patients who develop atrial fibrillation (AF) and cardiovascular events during long-term RV septal pacing have not been described.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively evaluated the incidence of AF and cardiovascular events, including cardiac death, heart failure requiring hospitalization, or stroke, for a median of 4.0 years in 123 recipients of dual-chamber pacemakers implanted for atrioventricular block with preserved left ventricular function, who were free from AF before device implantation. AF developed in 30 patients (24%), and multivariable analysis suggested that the cumulative percentage of RV pacing was the only independent predictor of newly developed AF (hazard ratio: 1.19 for each 10% increment; 95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.41; P=0.01). Furthermore, older age, newly developed AF and a paced QRS duration ≥155 ms at pacemaker implantation were significant predictors of cardiovascular events.

CONCLUSIONS

RV septum pacing may induce AF in up to one-quarter of patients paced for atrioventricular block, according to the frequency of pacing. More importantly, in such patients, AF induced by RV pacing and a paced QRS duration ≥155 ms at pacemaker implantation are significantly associated with poor prognosis. Therefore, we recommend pacing from sites producing a paced QRS duration <155 ms and avoiding unnecessary RV pacing. (Circ J 2016; 80: 2302-2309).

摘要

背景

右心室(RV)间隔起搏是否能改善预后尚不清楚。此外,长期RV间隔起搏过程中发生心房颤动(AF)和心血管事件的患者的临床特征尚未得到描述。

方法与结果

我们回顾性评估了123例因房室传导阻滞植入双腔起搏器且左心室功能保留、植入前无AF的患者,在中位4.0年时间里AF和心血管事件的发生率,这些事件包括心源性死亡、需住院治疗的心力衰竭或中风。30例患者(24%)发生了AF,多变量分析表明,RV起搏的累积百分比是新发生AF的唯一独立预测因素(风险比:每增加10%为1.19;95%置信区间:1.04 - 1.41;P = 0.01)。此外,年龄较大、新发生AF以及起搏器植入时起搏QRS时限≥155 ms是心血管事件的重要预测因素。

结论

根据起搏频率,RV间隔起搏可能在高达四分之一的房室传导阻滞起搏患者中诱发AF。更重要的是,在此类患者中,RV起搏诱发的AF以及起搏器植入时起搏QRS时限≥155 ms与不良预后显著相关。因此,我们建议从产生起搏QRS时限<155 ms的部位进行起搏,并避免不必要的RV起搏。(《循环杂志》2016年;80:2302 - 2309)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验