Muposhi Victor K, Gandiwa Edson, Chemura Abel, Bartels Paul, Makuza Stanley M, Madiri Tinaapi H
School of Wildlife, Ecology and Conservation, Chinhoyi University of Technology, Private Bag 7724, Chinhoyi, Zimbabwe.
School of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Chinhoyi University of Technology, Private Bag 7724, Chinhoyi, Zimbabwe.
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 28;11(9):e0163084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163084. eCollection 2016.
An understanding of the habitat selection patterns by wild herbivores is critical for adaptive management, particularly towards ecosystem management and wildlife conservation in semi arid savanna ecosystems. We tested the following predictions: (i) surface water availability, habitat quality and human presence have a strong influence on the spatial distribution of wild herbivores in the dry season, (ii) habitat suitability for large herbivores would be higher compared to medium-sized herbivores in the dry season, and (iii) spatial extent of suitable habitats for wild herbivores will be different between years, i.e., 2006 and 2010, in Matetsi Safari Area, Zimbabwe. MaxEnt modeling was done to determine the habitat suitability of large herbivores and medium-sized herbivores. MaxEnt modeling of habitat suitability for large herbivores using the environmental variables was successful for the selected species in 2006 and 2010, except for elephant (Loxodonta africana) for the year 2010. Overall, large herbivores probability of occurrence was mostly influenced by distance from rivers. Distance from roads influenced much of the variability in the probability of occurrence of medium-sized herbivores. The overall predicted area for large and medium-sized herbivores was not different. Large herbivores may not necessarily utilize larger habitat patches over medium-sized herbivores due to the habitat homogenizing effect of water provisioning. Effect of surface water availability, proximity to riverine ecosystems and roads on habitat suitability of large and medium-sized herbivores in the dry season was highly variable thus could change from one year to another. We recommend adaptive management initiatives aimed at ensuring dynamic water supply in protected areas through temporal closure and or opening of water points to promote heterogeneity of wildlife habitats.
了解野生食草动物的栖息地选择模式对于适应性管理至关重要,特别是对于半干旱稀树草原生态系统的生态系统管理和野生动物保护而言。我们检验了以下预测:(i)地表水可利用性、栖息地质量和人类活动对旱季野生食草动物的空间分布有强烈影响;(ii)旱季大型食草动物的栖息地适宜性高于中型食草动物;(iii)津巴布韦马泰西野生动物保护区2006年和2010年这两年间,野生食草动物适宜栖息地的空间范围会有所不同。采用最大熵模型来确定大型食草动物和中型食草动物的栖息地适宜性。利用环境变量对大型食草动物栖息地适宜性进行的最大熵建模,除了2010年的大象(非洲象)外,对2006年和2010年选定的物种都取得了成功。总体而言,大型食草动物的出现概率主要受距河流距离的影响。距道路的距离对中型食草动物出现概率的变化影响很大。大型和中型食草动物的总体预测面积没有差异。由于供水对栖息地的同质化作用,大型食草动物不一定比中型食草动物利用更大的栖息地斑块。旱季地表水可利用性、与河流生态系统和道路的距离对大型和中型食草动物栖息地适宜性的影响变化很大,因此可能会随年份而改变。我们建议采取适应性管理措施,旨在通过临时关闭和/或开放水源点来确保保护区内动态供水,以促进野生动物栖息地的异质性。