• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非连续日与连续日抗阻训练对休闲训练受试者的影响

Nonconsecutive versus consecutive-day resistance training in recreationally trained subjects.

作者信息

da Silva Carvalho Alcino D, Rodrigues Santos José A

机构信息

Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal -

Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2018 Mar;58(3):233-240. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06660-3. Epub 2016 Sep 29.

DOI:10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06660-3
PMID:27682004
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that total-body resistance training (RT) performed two to three alternating days per week has positive effects on muscle strength and body composition. However, no evidence exists to determine if total-body RT workouts done on consecutive days (CD) are beneficial. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the effects of a total-body RT program performed on three consecutive or nonconsecutive days (NCD) per week for 7 weeks on maximum strength and body composition in recreationally trained subjects.

METHODS

Twenty-one men were randomly assigned to a 3NCD (N.=11) or 3CD group (N.=10). Prior and following training, anthropometric measures, and 1 repetition maximum values for leg press, and bench press were measured.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis revealed a significant increase for leg press strength and bench press strength for both groups (P<0.01) from pre to post intervention. There was also a significant increase for arm and chest girth measures (P<0.05) on the 3 CD group. No significant differences between groups were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that RT programs performed on three consecutive or nonconsecutive days per week determine similar effects on maximum strength, and body composition.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,每周两到三天交替进行的全身阻力训练(RT)对肌肉力量和身体成分有积极影响。然而,尚无证据确定连续几天(CD)进行的全身RT训练是否有益。因此,本研究的目的是比较每周连续三天或不连续三天(NCD)进行7周的全身RT计划对接受过休闲训练的受试者的最大力量和身体成分的影响。

方法

21名男性被随机分配到3NCD组(N = 11)或3CD组(N = 10)。在训练前后,测量人体测量指标以及腿举和卧推的1次重复最大值。

结果

统计分析显示,两组干预前后腿举力量和卧推力量均显著增加(P < 0.01)。3CD组的手臂和胸围测量值也显著增加(P < 0.05)。两组之间未观察到显著差异。

结论

结果表明,每周连续三天或不连续三天进行的RT计划对最大力量和身体成分的影响相似。

相似文献

1
Nonconsecutive versus consecutive-day resistance training in recreationally trained subjects.非连续日与连续日抗阻训练对休闲训练受试者的影响
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2018 Mar;58(3):233-240. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06660-3. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
2
Comparison of two lower-body modes of endurance training on lower-body strength development while concurrently training.两种下肢耐力训练模式对同时进行训练时下肢力量发展的比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 May;23(3):979-87. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a0629d.
3
Nonlinear periodization maximizes strength gains in split resistance training routines.非线性周期化训练在分体式抗阻训练计划中能使力量增长最大化。
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Jul;23(4):1321-6. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a00f96.
4
Strength, body composition, and functional outcomes in the squat versus leg press exercises.深蹲与腿举练习中的力量、身体成分及功能结果
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2018 Mar;58(3):263-270. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06698-6. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
5
High-Frequency Resistance Training Is Not More Effective Than Low-Frequency Resistance Training in Increasing Muscle Mass and Strength in Well-Trained Men.高频阻力训练并不比低频阻力训练更能有效增加训练有素男性的肌肉质量和力量。
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jul;33 Suppl 1:S130-S139. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002559.
6
Influence of supervision ratio on muscle adaptations to resistance training in nontrained subjects.监督比例对未经训练受试者抗阻训练肌肉适应性的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Mar;24(3):639-43. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181ad3373.
7
Short-term heavy resistance training eliminates age-related deficits in muscle mass and strength in healthy older males.短期大强度抗阻训练可消除健康老年男性肌肉质量和力量的增龄性下降。
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Feb;25(2):326-33. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bf43c8.
8
A comparison of the effects of 6 weeks of traditional resistance training, plyometric training, and complex training on measures of strength and anthropometrics.传统抗阻训练、增强式训练和复合训练对力量和人体测量学指标影响的比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Feb;26(2):422-31. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318220df79.
9
Early-phase adaptations to a split-body, linear periodization resistance training program in college-aged and middle-aged men.大学年龄段和中年男性对分体式、线性周期化抗阻训练计划的早期适应情况。
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 May;23(3):962-71. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a00baf.
10
Effects of linear vs. daily undulatory periodized resistance training on maximal and submaximal strength gains.线性与每日波动周期化抗阻训练对最大和次最大力量增益的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Jul;25(7):1824-30. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e7ff75.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Consecutive Versus Non-consecutive Days of Resistance Training on Strength, Body Composition, and Red Blood Cells.连续与非连续日进行抗阻训练对力量、身体成分和红细胞的影响。
Front Physiol. 2018 Jun 18;9:725. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00725. eCollection 2018.