• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of human immunodeficiency virus seroprevalence in population surveys using pooled sera.使用混合血清在人群调查中评估人类免疫缺陷病毒血清流行率。
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Jul;27(7):1449-52. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.7.1449-1452.1989.
2
Reducing the cost of HIV antibody testing.降低艾滋病毒抗体检测成本。
Lancet. 1993 Jul 10;342(8863):87-90. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91289-x.
3
Successful use of pooled sera to determine HIV-1 seroprevalence in Zaire with development of cost-efficiency models.成功使用混合血清来确定扎伊尔的HIV-1血清流行率并开发成本效益模型。
AIDS. 1990 Aug;4(8):737-41. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199008000-00004.
4
Evaluation of efficacy of pooled sera in a human immunodeficiency virus antibody prevalence in population surveys.群体调查中混合血清在人类免疫缺陷病毒抗体流行率检测中的效能评估。
Rev Roum Virol. 1990 Jan-Mar;41(1):45-51.
5
Pooling of sera for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing: an economical method for use in developing countries.用于人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)检测的血清混合:一种适用于发展中国家的经济方法。
J Clin Pathol. 1988 May;41(5):582-5. doi: 10.1136/jcp.41.5.582.
6
Field testing and comparative evaluation of rapid, visually read screening assays for antibody to human immunodeficiency virus.人类免疫缺陷病毒抗体快速视觉读取筛查检测方法的现场测试与比较评估
Lancet. 1989 Mar 18;1(8638):580-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91610-3.
7
Reduction of the cost of testing for antibody to human immunodeficiency virus, without losing sensitivity, by pooling sera.通过合并血清来降低人类免疫缺陷病毒抗体检测成本,同时不损失灵敏度。
Indian J Med Res. 1993 Jan;97:1-3.
8
Sensitivity and specificity of pooled versus individual sera in a human immunodeficiency virus antibody prevalence study.一项人类免疫缺陷病毒抗体流行率研究中混合血清与个体血清的敏感性和特异性
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Aug;27(8):1893-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.8.1893-1895.1989.
9
Evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent and alternative assays for detection of HIV antibodies using panels of Brazilian sera.使用巴西血清样本评估酶联免疫吸附及其他检测HIV抗体的检测方法。
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1990 Mar-Apr;32(2):96-100. doi: 10.1590/s0036-46651990000200006.
10
Comparison of five commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and Western immunoblotting for human immunodeficiency virus antibody detection in serum samples from Central Africa.五种商业酶联免疫吸附测定法与蛋白质免疫印迹法在检测中非血清样本中人类免疫缺陷病毒抗体方面的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Oct;29(10):2280-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.10.2280-2284.1991.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel application of one-step pooled molecular testing and maximum likelihood approaches to estimate the prevalence of malaria parasitaemia among rapid diagnostic test negative samples in western Kenya.一步法混合分子检测和最大似然法在肯尼亚西部快速诊断检测阴性样本中估算疟疾寄生虫血症患病率的新应用。
Malar J. 2022 Nov 6;21(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12936-022-04323-2.
2
Prediction-driven pooled testing methods: Application to HIV treatment monitoring in Rakai, Uganda.预测驱动的合并检测方法:在乌干达拉凯的 HIV 治疗监测中的应用。
Stat Med. 2021 Aug 30;40(19):4185-4199. doi: 10.1002/sim.9022. Epub 2021 May 28.
3
COVID-19 prevalence estimation by random sampling in population - optimal sample pooling under varying assumptions about true prevalence.人群中随机抽样的 COVID-19 患病率估计 - 针对真实患病率的不同假设的最优样本合并。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jul 23;20(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01081-0.
4
Multi-Stage Group Testing Improves Efficiency of Large-Scale COVID-19 Screening.多阶段分组检测提高大规模 COVID-19 筛查效率。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Jul;128:104382. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104382. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
5
Addressing data privacy in matched studies via virtual pooling.通过虚拟池化解决匹配研究中的数据隐私问题。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Sep 7;17(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0419-0.
6
An efficient design strategy for logistic regression using outcome- and covariate-dependent pooling of biospecimens prior to assay.一种在检测前使用基于结果和协变量的生物样本合并策略进行逻辑回归的高效设计策略。
Biometrics. 2016 Sep;72(3):965-75. doi: 10.1111/biom.12489. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
7
A Discriminant Function Approach to Adjust for Processing and Measurement Error When a Biomarker is Assayed in Pooled Samples.当在混合样本中检测生物标志物时,一种用于校正处理和测量误差的判别函数方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Nov 18;12(11):14723-40. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121114723.
8
High-throughput screening of tick-borne pathogens in Europe.欧洲蜱传病原体的高通量筛查。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014 Jul 29;4:103. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00103. eCollection 2014.
9
Prevalence estimation subject to misclassification: the mis-substitution bias and some remedies.受错误分类影响的患病率估计:误替代偏差及一些补救措施。
Stat Med. 2014 Nov 10;33(25):4482-500. doi: 10.1002/sim.6268. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
10
Pooled nucleic acid testing to identify antiretroviral treatment failure during HIV infection.聚合酶链反应核酸检测在艾滋病病毒感染中发现抗逆转录病毒治疗失败。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Feb;53(2):194-201. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181ba37a7.

本文引用的文献

1
Measurement of the false positive rate in a screening program for human immunodeficiency virus infections.人类免疫缺陷病毒感染筛查项目中假阳性率的测定。
N Engl J Med. 1988 Oct 13;319(15):961-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198810133191501.
2
Pooling of sera for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing: an economical method for use in developing countries.用于人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)检测的血清混合:一种适用于发展中国家的经济方法。
J Clin Pathol. 1988 May;41(5):582-5. doi: 10.1136/jcp.41.5.582.
3
AIDS in Africa: an epidemiologic paradigm.非洲的艾滋病:一种流行病学模式。
Science. 1986 Nov 21;234(4779):955-63. doi: 10.1126/science.3022379.
4
Testing for human immunodeficiency virus.人类免疫缺陷病毒检测
Ann Intern Med. 1986 Oct;105(4):609-10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-105-4-609.
5
The AIDS problem in Africa.非洲的艾滋病问题。
Lancet. 1986 Jan 11;1(8472):79-83. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90728-2.
6
ELISA HTLV retrovirus antibody reactivity associated with malaria and immune complexes in healthy Africans.健康非洲人中与疟疾和免疫复合物相关的ELISA法检测HTLV逆转录病毒抗体反应性
Lancet. 1985 Sep 7;2(8454):520-3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)90461-1.

使用混合血清在人群调查中评估人类免疫缺陷病毒血清流行率。

Evaluation of human immunodeficiency virus seroprevalence in population surveys using pooled sera.

作者信息

Kline R L, Brothers T A, Brookmeyer R, Zeger S, Quinn T C

机构信息

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Jul;27(7):1449-52. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.7.1449-1452.1989.

DOI:10.1128/jcm.27.7.1449-1452.1989
PMID:2768435
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC267591/
Abstract

The pooling of individual serum samples to determine human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seropositivity was examined to assess whether testing pooled sera was technically feasible, cost-effective, and accurate for estimating seroprevalence in large population surveys. The sensitivities and specificities of three commercially available HIV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits were tested using 65 serum pools of 15 individual serum samples each (975 total serum samples) at two different dilutions. With pooled sera, the Organon Teknika Bio-EnzaBead ELISA at half the dilution recommended by the manufacturer showed the best agreement with ELISA and Western blot results of individual sera. In subsequently testing 92 pools, each containing 15 individual serum samples from a population of American patients attending a sexually transmitted diseases clinic, the estimated seroprevalence was 5.27 compared with 4.93% in a test of 1,380 individual serum samples and 5.19% in a test of 4,028 individual serum samples from the same population. In an evaluation of 1,380 African patients using 10 serum samples per pool, the estimated seroprevalence was 5.79 compared with 6.16% in a test of individual sera. These results indicate that ELISA testing with pooled sera is highly sensitive and specific and appears to be a cost-effective means for estimating HIV seroprevalence in large population-based surveys.

摘要

为评估在大规模人群调查中检测混合血清以估计血清阳性率在技术上是否可行、是否具有成本效益以及是否准确,对用于确定人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)血清阳性的个体血清样本混合进行了研究。使用三种市售的HIV酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)试剂盒,在两种不同稀释度下,对65个血清池(每个血清池包含15个个体血清样本,共975个血清样本)进行了敏感性和特异性测试。对于混合血清,Organon Teknika Bio-EnzaBead ELISA在制造商推荐稀释度的一半时,与个体血清的ELISA和蛋白质印迹结果显示出最佳一致性。随后对92个血清池进行检测,每个血清池包含来自一家性传播疾病诊所的美国患者群体的15个个体血清样本,估计血清阳性率为5.27%,而对来自同一群体的1380个个体血清样本进行检测时该比例为4.93%,对4028个个体血清样本进行检测时该比例为5.19%。在对1380名非洲患者进行评估时,每个血清池使用10个血清样本,估计血清阳性率为5.79%,而对个体血清进行检测时该比例为6.16%。这些结果表明,使用混合血清进行ELISA检测具有高度敏感性和特异性,似乎是在基于人群的大规模调查中估计HIV血清阳性率的一种具有成本效益的方法。