• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韦氏成人智力量表修订版(WAIS-R)与韦氏儿童智力量表修订版(WISC-R)在16岁时的等效性。

The equivalence of the WAIS-R and the WISC-R at age 16.

作者信息

Quereshi M Y, Treis K M, Riebe A L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53233.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1989 Jul;45(4):633-41. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198907)45:4<633::aid-jclp2270450420>3.0.co;2-r.

DOI:10.1002/1097-4679(198907)45:4<633::aid-jclp2270450420>3.0.co;2-r
PMID:2768503
Abstract

Two studies were conducted in which the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children--Revised (WISC-R) and the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale--Revised (WAIS-R) were administered in a counterbalanced design to 144 (72 in each study) randomly selected high school students between the ages of 16 years, 0 months and 16 years, 11 months in order to determine their equivalence by testing the equality of (a) means; (b) variances; and (c) validity coefficients based on the scaled scores and IQs. Results indicated that the two scales, with the possible exception of the Verbal IQ, were not equivalent (either with respect to subtest scores or IQs) because they did not satisfy the necessary criteria. These findings contradict those reported by Wechsler in 1981 concerning these two scales for a similar age group.

摘要

开展了两项研究,采用平衡设计对144名(每项研究72名)年龄在16岁0个月至16岁11个月之间随机抽取的高中生施测韦氏儿童智力量表修订版(WISC-R)和韦氏成人智力量表修订版(WAIS-R),以通过检验以下各项的相等性来确定它们的等效性:(a) 均值;(b) 方差;以及 (c) 基于量表分数和智商的效度系数。结果表明,这两个量表,可能言语智商除外,并不等效(无论是在分测验分数还是智商方面),因为它们未满足必要标准。这些发现与韦氏在1981年报告的关于这两个量表用于类似年龄组的结果相矛盾。

相似文献

1
The equivalence of the WAIS-R and the WISC-R at age 16.韦氏成人智力量表修订版(WAIS-R)与韦氏儿童智力量表修订版(WISC-R)在16岁时的等效性。
J Clin Psychol. 1989 Jul;45(4):633-41. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198907)45:4<633::aid-jclp2270450420>3.0.co;2-r.
2
Comparison of WAIS and WAIS-R scores of mildly and moderately mentally retarded adults.轻度和中度智力发育迟缓成年人的韦氏成人智力量表(WAIS)与韦氏成人智力量表修订版(WAIS-R)得分比较。
Am J Ment Defic. 1984 Nov;89(3):301-3.
3
Inverse relationship between the WISC-R/WAIS-R score disparity and IQ level in the lower range of intelligence.在低智商范围内,韦氏儿童智力量表修订版(WISC-R)/韦氏成人智力量表修订版(WAIS-R)得分差异与智商水平之间的负相关关系。
Am J Ment Retard. 1988 Jan;92(4):376-8.
4
Comparison of WAIS-R and WISC-III scores with a sample of 16-year-old youth.
Psychol Rep. 1998 Jun;82(3 Pt 2):1339-46. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1998.82.3c.1339.
5
Correlations for Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children--Revised and the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence for Iranian children.伊朗儿童韦氏儿童智力量表修订版与韦氏学前及初小儿童智力量表的相关性。
Psychol Rep. 1992 Feb;70(1):27-30. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1992.70.1.27.
6
Report on Shanghai norms for the Chinese translation of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised.《韦氏儿童智力量表修订版》中文翻译的上海常模报告。
Psychol Rep. 1990 Oct;67(2):531-41. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1990.67.2.531.
7
Construct validity of the WISC-IV with a referred sample: direct versus indirect hierarchical structures.韦氏儿童智力量表第四版(WISC-IV)在转介样本中的结构效度:直接与间接层次结构
Sch Psychol Q. 2014 Mar;29(1):38-51. doi: 10.1037/spq0000032. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
8
A comparison of the WISC-R and the WAIS-R with special education students.韦氏儿童智力量表修订版(WISC-R)与韦氏成人智力量表修订版(WAIS-R)在特殊教育学生中的比较。
J Clin Psychol. 1987 May;43(3):377-80. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198705)43:3<377::aid-jclp2270430310>3.0.co;2-6.
9
WISC-R IQ estimates from the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery.基于鲁利亚-内布拉斯加神经心理成套测验得出的韦氏儿童智力量表修订版智商估计值。
Percept Mot Skills. 1993 Oct;77(2):683-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.1993.77.2.683.
10
The comparability of WAIS and WAIS-R IQs and subtest scores.
J Clin Psychol. 1983 Sep;39(5):754-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198309)39:5<754::aid-jclp2270390519>3.0.co;2-6.

引用本文的文献

1
The Flynn effect: a meta-analysis.弗林效应:一项荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Sep;140(5):1332-60. doi: 10.1037/a0037173. Epub 2014 Jun 30.