Pinto Carmine, Antonuzzo Lorenzo, Porcu Luca, Aprile Giuseppe, Maiello Evaristo, Masi Gianluca, Petrelli Fausto, Scartozzi Mario, Torri Valter, Barni Sandro
Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017 Jun;16(2):e61-e72. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
Whether bevacizumab represents a feasible option for the first-line treatment of unfit and elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains controversial. The present systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety data of bevacizumab combined with first-line fluoropyrimidine monochemotherapy for these complex patients.
A systematic search of the published data was conducted through May 31, 2016. The random-effects model was used to combine the effect estimates and the I index to quantify the between-study heterogeneity unexplained by sampling error.
We included 3 randomized controlled trials, 4 single-arm phase II trials, and 1 prospective cohort study in the present meta-analysis (n = 782). The monochemotherapy administered was capecitabine in 531 patients (67.9%) and 5-fluorouracil in 251 (32.1%); 500 (63.9%) also received bevacizumab. The median age was 75 years, 441 patients (56.4%) were men, and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 to 1 in 684 patients (87.7%). The combination with bevacizumab produced advantages in terms of both progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.64; P < .00001; I = 0%) and overall survival (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.98; P = .03; I = 0%). The pooled effect estimates of the randomized controlled trials have been previously reported. As expected, all-grade hypertension (27% vs. 4.9%), bleeding (24% vs. 6.4%), thromboembolic events (10% vs. 5%), and proteinuria (25.6% vs. 8.2%) were more frequent in the bevacizumab combination group.
Adding bevacizumab to first-line fluoropyrimidine monochemotherapy significantly improved progression-free and overall survival in unfit and elderly patients with mCRC, with a manageable safety profile and no unexpected toxicities.
贝伐单抗是否是不适合接受治疗的老年转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者一线治疗的可行选择仍存在争议。本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了贝伐单抗联合一线氟嘧啶单药化疗对这些复杂患者的疗效和安全性数据。
对截至2016年5月31日发表的数据进行系统检索。采用随机效应模型合并效应估计值,并使用I指数量化抽样误差无法解释的研究间异质性。
本荟萃分析纳入了3项随机对照试验、4项单臂II期试验和1项前瞻性队列研究(n = 782)。接受单药化疗的患者中,531例(67.9%)使用卡培他滨,251例(32.1%)使用5-氟尿嘧啶;500例(63.9%)还接受了贝伐单抗治疗。中位年龄为75岁,441例(56.4%)为男性,684例(87.7%)患者东部肿瘤协作组体能状态为0至1。联合使用贝伐单抗在无进展生存期(风险比,0.52;95%置信区间,0.43 - 0.64;P <.00001;I = 0%)和总生存期(HR,0.79;95% CI,0.64 - 0.98;P =.03;I = 0%)方面均具有优势。随机对照试验的合并效应估计值此前已有报道。正如预期的那样,贝伐单抗联合治疗组中所有级别的高血压(27%对4.9%)、出血(24%对6.4%)、血栓栓塞事件(10%对5%)和蛋白尿(25.6%对8.2%)更为常见。
在一线氟嘧啶单药化疗中添加贝伐单抗可显著改善不适合接受治疗的老年mCRC患者的无进展生存期和总生存期,安全性可控,且无意外毒性。